I thought she wanted discovery?
She's claiming that her Dominion claims are now "opinion" and not "fact".
Combined with her lead witness caught lying about his credentials, I often suspected she was purposely mislead to distract from the real mail-in ballot fraud.
Here's the actual court document in case people say its fake news: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699.22.2_3.pdf
Why is she asking them to dismiss at all? Shouldn't she be daring them to take her to court, so in discovery, she can access all machines and evidence?
Exactly. You would want to keep them in court and open them up to discovery and access.
Not in dc. Your argument rests on the claim that a fair trial can be had in dc.