Some of you idiots don't get that while yes you can look at overall statistics, you can also be a judge of someones character on a person by person basis. If you see an interracial couple's marriage break up that you know nothing about, and you look at the white person and think they deserve it, then you have some serious fucking problems with your mentality.
Just judge people based on their character once you meet them in real life. Is that so hard to understand? If you don't the GTFO this site, this is for patriots.
Sure but if you can’t use that information effectively by thinking of potential pit falls in the basic logic then you could be just as clueless or even do more harm then good.
For example:
I’m very passionate about motorcycles and there are so many examples of this happening from people using statistics. Like people saying it’s safer to not brake in a corner, don’t ever speed, and the 70/30 rule for front/rear brake usage. All of them on the surface have their source of statistics yet if you blindly follow them you’re gonna be putting yourself at an increased risk of getting into an accident.
It takes a wise individual to think for themselves and reason things out.
Also see Bill Burr’s joke on ImRight.com. Simple but it makes the point I’m trying to say.
Some of you idiots don't get that while yes you can look at overall statistics, you can also be a judge of someones character on a person by person basis. If you see an interracial couple's marriage break up that you know nothing about, and you look at the white person and think they deserve it, then you have some serious fucking problems with your mentality.
Just judge people based on their character once you meet them in real life. Is that so hard to understand? If you don't the GTFO this site, this is for patriots.
The singular point of noticing patterns and statistics is being able to use those when you have a limited set of information to go on.
Sure but if you can’t use that information effectively by thinking of potential pit falls in the basic logic then you could be just as clueless or even do more harm then good.
For example: I’m very passionate about motorcycles and there are so many examples of this happening from people using statistics. Like people saying it’s safer to not brake in a corner, don’t ever speed, and the 70/30 rule for front/rear brake usage. All of them on the surface have their source of statistics yet if you blindly follow them you’re gonna be putting yourself at an increased risk of getting into an accident.
It takes a wise individual to think for themselves and reason things out.
Also see Bill Burr’s joke on ImRight.com. Simple but it makes the point I’m trying to say.