510
Comments (76)
sorted by:
6
sustainable_saltmine 6 points ago +7 / -1

thing is, Walmart shouldn't have that right. If they're not being forced by an authority to mandate it in their stores, they should be banned from discriminating against those who don't wear masks

5
RizzlieDoodad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Walmart doesn't have that right. Just walk past them

3
spezisthedevil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I haven't worn a mask in Walmart since the fake pandemic started. Just say you can't wear one and keep going. They won't do shit.

5
RizzlieDoodad 5 points ago +5 / -0

I asked the security guard if he had a gun. He said no, I kept walking

3
Thep1mp 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t say anything. Completely ignore them.

2
crazyjackel 2 points ago +4 / -2

Honestly, I disagree with you there, I think they should lose business, such that they decide that they should open up and allow masks.

If you are in a state where masks are allowed, shop at stores that no longer require masks. Businesses will stop when they realize they can make money and won't be sued by the government.

I personally come from the view that government's job is to defend life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and property for all its citizens from those that wish to deprive the citizenry of that right. The government imposing masks as a criminal offense was a neglect of their duty to defend liberty (though, they might argue that it was to defend life, which means that the left is now pro-life).

2
BurtMcGirt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would agree with you if we didn't have places that were pretty much monopolies. Walmart ran so many places out of business that a lot of places have no other reasonable options. Also, the US taxpayers subsidize most of Walmart's workforce. I don't like the idea of oligarchs enforcing their religion upon people any more than I like the government doing it. Still gave you an upvote though, because it's nice to see someone who can disagree in a civil way.

1
crazyjackel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I personally find that it is always a problem with power. No matter whom you are, you do not want to be ruled over by power. In this respect, the sanders people are right that big corporations are powerful and that they don't want to be ruled over by them, but I argue that the government is no solution and the lack of government is no solution either.

I instead am forced to reckon with the idea that power will always exist and will always be abused and there is nothing I can do about that except obtain power to defend myself from others' power. When I ask myself, wherein might I desire the power to be placed in regards to that goal, I think I would much prefer oligarchs than governmental power.

The C.S. Lewis quote goes: "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree!

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

^^THIS. (sustainable_saltmine, NOT HanginChad)

Although I have to say, neither my husband nor I wear a mask in their stores. They're more tolerant than most, at least around here.

-2
HanginChad -2 points ago +1 / -3

Should I have the right to ask someone to do that or to take off their shoes when they come into my house?

4
Drinkup4 4 points ago +4 / -0

I find Walmart is the easiest place to not wear a mask. We still have a mask mandate, but I haven't worn one in Walmart for weeks. Nobody cares.

Also, of course you shouldn't have to bake a cake it it violates your religious beliefs or for any other reason. Let the free market take care of it. If someone is truly bigoted they will go out of business.

4
angryrhino83 4 points ago +4 / -0

My local Walmart don't have any mask signage up and this is in a heavy blue area with mask mandates. They sometimes offer a mask when I go in but I just tell them no thanks.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree -- if someone doesn't want to make you a cake, find someone who will lol

4
BoughtByBloomberg2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Learn these words "I have a medical condition" "No you may not know what it is that is a violation of my right to privacy."

Or....

Don't shop at cucked stores.

2
Daughterfreedom76 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Wal-Mart here in my town didn't say shit to me for not wearing a mask.

2
geckogreen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't think Walmart enforced their mask rule. I live in a very liberal suburb of Seattle and never wear a mask in Walmart. They offer one, but I just decline.

2
mushroomhead 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Twitter is a better analogy...

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't ever really think about Twitter lol

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Themodsrfags 2 points ago +2 / -0

If its gay dudes they might like it

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

nasty

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BurtMcGirt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oligarchs are just as powerful as the government in this country.

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

exactly -- but our leaders are cucks

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bakery guy has an even stronger case than that.

Walmart is trying to make their customers do things.

Baker is just not doing something he doesn't want to do.

The proper analogy would be the opposite, if masks were mandated and Walmart told their customers they didn't have to.

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

good point

1
waddisme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes no sense how they have to bake a cake, yet Paypal, BOA, Visa can deny services to conservatives. Seems like same principal to me.

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

it is -- same principle but unfair application.

1
G_regulator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally I don't think anyone should be denied access to any service based on political ideology, sexual orientation or anything else, other than abusive behaviour.

People here will cry foul when Gab gets denied access to banking services because of political affiliation but will support a baker refusing to serve a transgender.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm agnostic, but I still support people of faith. If its against someone's faith and they can clearly communicate that, it should be their option. We live in a free country. Any person that goes out of the way to sue someone for that is just using the person as an excuse to make their political point. The Dems have been using the Judicial Branch to enact revenge against those they oppose and THAT shit needs to end.

1
G_regulator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree that sueing instead of just finding a baker that's happy to do the work is using the judicial branch to punish those who disagree with your opinions.

Also there's a difference between being denied access to services universally because of your political or religious beliefs and being denied service by one baker and not another.

Fundamentally I think we agree.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do believe we agree -- reasonable people can do that lol

1
Fignugent 1 point ago +3 / -2

baker case went in favor of the baker, so i don't know what you're babbling about

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

they're being sued again but for a transgender cake -- so the baker is going to have to go through that shit again probably when the same principle will apply from his first lawsuit that he won

0
Fignugent 0 points ago +2 / -2

first step is to stop living in a cucked ass state

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL thats most of them!

0
Fignugent 0 points ago +1 / -1

sure does seem that way, lately

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our resident Mask Karen strikes again!

-1
Fignugent -1 points ago +1 / -2

our resident "fuck your rights as a business" commie has joined the fight!

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahaha. You are such angry, little hypocrite.

-1
Fignugent -1 points ago +1 / -2

you're an ignorant retard that doesn't know the definitions of words you try to use

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Keep trying to spread your religion while you denigrate Christians, hypocrite.

-1
Fignugent -1 points ago +1 / -2

i don't have a religion

once again you have no idea the meaning of the words you use

retard

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do have a religion. You lie about it, because you are a hypocrite. Relying upon a cloth mask to stop viruses is as religious as it gets....hypocrite.

1
LeeeroyJennnkins 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm in PA and I never wear a mask anywhere including walmart. They do not enforce it. I'd have to look it up but I think their company policy is to just leave people alone.

1
tiberseptim37 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pay close attention to the "gay cake" appeals occurring right now. If the law comes down against private businesses, this needs to be our next move.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the law goes against the Baker, it goes against COPRORATE -- Who will pay off the Dems then?

1
tiberseptim37 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bold of you to assume the same laws that apply to small businesses apply to large corporations.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, realizing they don't. Not bold of me, naïve of me to think it should be fair.

1
tiberseptim37 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wanting the world to be better isn't naivety, it's hope.

2
BS2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope lol

1
BBQWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, I ain't wearing a mask in walmart. Compliance is only about 30% where I live.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because retail establishments are public accommodations and, therefore, cannot discriminate against protected classes. Heteros, whites, Christians, and...the unmasked are not protected classes.

See how that works? We all knew it wasn't about "loving who we love." It's always been about forcing perversions onto the rest of us.

I don't give a rat's fanny what people do in their own bedrooms. It's none of my business until it becomes my business, and it's becoming my business more often.

1
BS2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

it seems to be becoming everyone business and that means its not about THAT business at all -- it is just about the DEMS needing a divisive factor to win elections -- everyone else fighting is their benefit -- THATS PERVERSE!

0
empiretc 0 points ago +1 / -1

this is very true, and why that bullshit should have never happened to that baker.

it is annoying now to see so many places with the "no shoes, no shirt, no mask- no service" signs. But, they are a private business and can do that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
empiretc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed, but it would indeed be a major fight to make it stop. It is like them telling you - you have to wear a hat!!

Not one MSM outlet talked about the CDC finding that these masks people are wearing are useless, and N95/surgical masks are only 2% effective.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
empiretc 1 point ago +1 / -0

that the cloth masks everyone is wearing do absolutely nothing to protect against a virus, and the N95/surgical masks are only 2% effective.

The report is on their website. it is from ~2 weeks ago.

0
c89631147e 0 points ago +1 / -1

A better question is why are you still shopping at Walmart? 🤔