11
Comments (13)
sorted by:
4
VarusSPQR 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unconstitutional. But it will go unchallenged because our courts are compromised.

4
556x45mm 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd love to see SCOTUS say they won't hear the case because of civil unrest

2
VarusSPQR 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’ll just say “no merit” if someone objects. They are owned by the Communists. Potato will do whatever his handlers demand. He has a total green light.

4
FusionRealm 4 points ago +4 / -0

This potato must not know what the constitution is.

3
GenericInsult 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh he knows what it is, but simply doesn't give a fuck. (Neither do any other Liberal Democrats)

4
BIDENTHEKIDSNIFFER 4 points ago +4 / -0

I guess hes really detemined to kick the civil war off early.

3
leet23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is anyone really actually gonna listen, it's just posturing from an old peado who can only eat blended food, fuck him.

3
bigbossman2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to worry, the Judicial branch of the government will protect us.

The Supreme Court has done a wonderful job lately making sure our constitutional rights are being upheld.

2
556x45mm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assault weapon definition

"A firearm that can except a detachable magazine and has 2 or more characteristics of a pistol grip, forward grip, threaded barrel, folding or collapsible stock "

So he signs an EO on these firearms, there are millions of them in citizens possession, how the fuck is he gonna "ban" them?

Does he sign another EO directing the US Military to have special powers to kill you for them?

And what about state laws? Pro-gun sanctuary? LEO?

3
GenericInsult 3 points ago +3 / -0

Texan here. I dare them to try.

4
556x45mm 4 points ago +4 / -0

Texas versus all the police + military + UN Peacekeepers

I got my money on Texas baby!

3
GenericInsult 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will most certainly go down shooting to defend my rights.