She went all in at the time, I don't blame her for saving her own skin if this is the path of greatest likelihood of success, but she will never live this down.
She kept saying "evidence is coming out to the public any day now" in November and NEVER delivered shit.
She choked harder than Romney in 2012 LMAO. Q-tard powell is an idiot who couldn't even spell words like "Georgia" and "District" right in her lawsuits.
we had evidence. We saw evidence. The court refused to see it. You saw it yourself. You saw the Georgia video of the ballots in suitcases. You saw the video with audio with of the price it costs to have someone get paid to shift votes. You saw the video of the vans pulling in with the ballots after it was closed.
You saw a court say we saw nothing. Case dismissed. she had the goods.
Not really the evidence that Powell was claiming. She was claiming she "had proof" that votes were switched. Her lawsuit contained no proof. Just "witnesses" who claimed that the machines could be accessed by foreign countries, unfortunately, that's not proof that votes were altered.
So what is proof to you? I believe she showed a great deal of proof. I work with statistics and proof to me is not the same as what you may believe. Outcomes that are not possible is proof.
If she knows something and can not show it legally without discovery then that is proof. Did you ever wonder why not one case anywhere in the country went to discovery? If I was her I would drop everything and run because the courts are compromised and she did not know that until now.
Paper that she illegally obtained and knows is printed from another country but she can not legally have it without discovery is proof that she could only supply in court.
Expert witnesses will provide other proof because she sent teams out with cameras to find that AZ votes showed abandon lots for homes with 90 people registered all democrat and all voting Biden on that lot.
you did not read what I wrote. She presented evidence and filed a case when you did not help at all.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
She went all in at the time, I don't blame her for saving her own skin if this is the path of greatest likelihood of success, but she will never live this down.
Her lawyers apparently said this...
Well, with lefty media who know full well she's telling the truth, of course not.
She is a QTARD grifter.
She kept saying "evidence is coming out to the public any day now" in November and NEVER delivered shit.
She choked harder than Romney in 2012 LMAO. Q-tard powell is an idiot who couldn't even spell words like "Georgia" and "District" right in her lawsuits.
we had evidence. We saw evidence. The court refused to see it. You saw it yourself. You saw the Georgia video of the ballots in suitcases. You saw the video with audio with of the price it costs to have someone get paid to shift votes. You saw the video of the vans pulling in with the ballots after it was closed.
You saw a court say we saw nothing. Case dismissed. she had the goods.
Not really the evidence that Powell was claiming. She was claiming she "had proof" that votes were switched. Her lawsuit contained no proof. Just "witnesses" who claimed that the machines could be accessed by foreign countries, unfortunately, that's not proof that votes were altered.
So what is proof to you? I believe she showed a great deal of proof. I work with statistics and proof to me is not the same as what you may believe. Outcomes that are not possible is proof.
If she knows something and can not show it legally without discovery then that is proof. Did you ever wonder why not one case anywhere in the country went to discovery? If I was her I would drop everything and run because the courts are compromised and she did not know that until now.
Paper that she illegally obtained and knows is printed from another country but she can not legally have it without discovery is proof that she could only supply in court.
Expert witnesses will provide other proof because she sent teams out with cameras to find that AZ votes showed abandon lots for homes with 90 people registered all democrat and all voting Biden on that lot.
So what is proof to you?
That was not her evidence, someone else found all of that. Sydney herself doesn't have any goods.
Not to mention she had so many typos and grammatical errors in those crappy ass lawsuits of hers that an elementary school student would laugh.
you did not read what I wrote. She presented evidence and filed a case when you did not help at all.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
TR