According to Barnes, who says she's a great person, but has a flaw where she's prone to fall for disinformation (and he witnessed this while working with her) it seems she started cozying up with Lin Wood and then started falling for the Qanon stuff. Hence her claims of hacking satellites, CIA seized servers, and international communist vote rigging plots from Hugo Chavez. Her main witness turned out to be a total fraud and lied about his credentials and background. But she did go around the media repeating this stuff as it was fact. I remember being attacked relentlessly for questioning some of what she was saying, because as I was told, "Powell would never say anything that wasn't 100% true"
But now she's basically saying her claims were just her opinion, and she didn't expect the public would take it as fact, and to please dismiss the case.
Yet prior, she was encouraging Dominion to sue her so that they would open themselves up to discovery.
I think Powell got in over her head and repeating sensationalist claims without vetting them and is now trying to save her ass.
She wasn't taking stuff from "Q" directly. She was taking stuff from the Qanon community and repeating it.
Such as the "seized servers showed Trump won 410 electoral votes". I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
It was repeated by some Congressman on a Zoom call, where it blew up, and then Powell re-tweeted it. She then repeated it on multiple interviews/media appearances. Even saying "I can confirm that the servers were seized but we just don't know who has them." Then after even alluded the good guys have them. Then kept repeating the "Trump won 410 electoral votes" claim.
That is just one example. Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble. Of course, when I brought it up I was shouted down as "how dare I question Powell, she's a lawyer, she would never say anything if it wasn't 100% true."
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
I still believe the election was stolen. I think Sydney's role was to keep the story going. She's done her job. Now we'll start to see more information come out since it appears that the lawsuits aren't going to happen because no court is willing to look at the evidence.
The other possibility is cases are brought forth in small courts. Stream those cases live and we've got another opportunity to share the truth.
No one is saying that the election wasn't stolen. It was very clearly stolen.
The issue is, people like Powell and Lin Wood made it seem like it was only stolen via Dominion and overseas control rooms switching the vote.
The reality is, they stole is using widespread mail-in ballot fraud, especially in Democrat strongholds in the remaining swing states on election night. Its why they panicked when Trump was about to win (95% odds to win) with huge leads in remaining states that mathematicians and analysts were saying it was impossible for Biden to catch up.
That's when they shut down the election/count and then spent days/weeks "finding" huge batches of Biden ballots from these counties. Such as the 3AM ballot dumps in Milwaukee and Detroit.
Powell never said mail in ballots weren’t used in the fraud. You are putting words in her mouth. They had to decide which tactic was best to go after and easiest to prove in court. Mail in ballots could only be proven with forensic audits in every state which they knew would never happen.
You are second guessing a legal strategy because it failed. It didn’t fail because it was the wrong or even incorrect strategy. It failed because the courts were in on the fraud.
Powell originally was on track with mail-in ballots. Then she went off the rails and getting sucked into the Qanon world and as such, kept on making more sensationalist and greater claims.
Robert Barnes, who was working alongside Powell, even said this himself. Originally, EVERYONE was focused on the mail-in ballots and there was massive pressure there to audit the signatures. This was back when a bunch of us were crowdsourcing information and the mathematical impossibilities were in the spotlight (which 100% scream mail-in ballot fraud in certain Democrat strongholds within the swing states).
The GA governor was about to let this happen, right before Powell went off the rails and started repeating the Qanon conspiracy theories. That's when GA had their easy "out" to dismiss the entire election fraud case as a wild nutjob conspiracy theory.
Overall, the entire legal fight devolved into a total mess.
Obviously, the tactic you believe they tried, didn't work. I don't see how proving a vast international communist plot to rig voting machines overseas is easier to prove than mail-in ballot fraud (which even Carter himself warned of decades ago) along with tons of information describing how mail-in ballots are easily prone to fraud.
Why even defend a failed strategy that put us in the shitty situation we are in now? IMO, all of the attention should have been 100% focused on the real and very visible fraud, which was 6-7 Democrat cities within the states that stopped the count kicked out observers, covered the windows, and then spent days/weeks finding batches of 200,000 ballots all for Biden and nothing down ballot.
We do have evidence of this, including the polling location that kicked out all the workers and pulled suitcases out with ballots and started counting them at 2AM when no one was around. We have witnesses who said they say thousands of mail-in ballots with zero folds, perfectly marked just Biden, with nothing down ballot. We have witnesses who saw them trucking in caches of ballots late at night with zero chain of custody after they stopped the count.
And we went from Trump about to claim victory and being ahead so big that election mathematicians were saying it was nearly impossible for Biden to catch up, to them spending up to a week coordinated between states to keep dumping ballots until they barely eeked out a lead and called it.
It's that simple and its 100% DAMN obvious. Why discredit that by trying to argue claims of communist vote swapping, secret satellites changing the votes, and foreign powers hacking into the voting machines?
Why not? Powell previously stated that she HOPES Dominion sues her so that they could open themselves up to discovery.
Well, she got her wish. They did sue her for defamation. If Powell's claims were 100% true, and she has the receipts and evidence like she claims, why isn't she presenting it?
She has made boastful speeches before how she will never back down. Yet here she is backing down and backtracking. Now saying "oh, it was just my opinion, and I didn't expect the public to immediately take it as a fact, please drop the case!"
You don’t present evidence until you are in discovery. That’s why. You sound like Tucker Carlson FFS. Others here have explained how she is not backing down or backtracking yet you ignore it in favor of believing a leftist rag like Vox. Fucking pathetic.
According to Barnes, who says she's a great person, but has a flaw where she's prone to fall for disinformation (and he witnessed this while working with her) it seems she started cozying up with Lin Wood and then started falling for the Qanon stuff. Hence her claims of hacking satellites, CIA seized servers, and international communist vote rigging plots from Hugo Chavez. Her main witness turned out to be a total fraud and lied about his credentials and background. But she did go around the media repeating this stuff as it was fact. I remember being attacked relentlessly for questioning some of what she was saying, because as I was told, "Powell would never say anything that wasn't 100% true"
But now she's basically saying her claims were just her opinion, and she didn't expect the public would take it as fact, and to please dismiss the case.
Yet prior, she was encouraging Dominion to sue her so that they would open themselves up to discovery.
I think Powell got in over her head and repeating sensationalist claims without vetting them and is now trying to save her ass.
Which part of what she said was from Qanon?
She wasn't taking stuff from "Q" directly. She was taking stuff from the Qanon community and repeating it.
Such as the "seized servers showed Trump won 410 electoral votes". I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
It was repeated by some Congressman on a Zoom call, where it blew up, and then Powell re-tweeted it. She then repeated it on multiple interviews/media appearances. Even saying "I can confirm that the servers were seized but we just don't know who has them." Then after even alluded the good guys have them. Then kept repeating the "Trump won 410 electoral votes" claim.
That is just one example. Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble. Of course, when I brought it up I was shouted down as "how dare I question Powell, she's a lawyer, she would never say anything if it wasn't 100% true."
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Your shit is beyond suspect.
But here you go: https://patriots.win/p/11QSH1vDSC/the-seized-server-story-how-it-s/
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
I remember all this shit
I still believe the election was stolen. I think Sydney's role was to keep the story going. She's done her job. Now we'll start to see more information come out since it appears that the lawsuits aren't going to happen because no court is willing to look at the evidence.
The other possibility is cases are brought forth in small courts. Stream those cases live and we've got another opportunity to share the truth.
No one is saying that the election wasn't stolen. It was very clearly stolen.
The issue is, people like Powell and Lin Wood made it seem like it was only stolen via Dominion and overseas control rooms switching the vote.
The reality is, they stole is using widespread mail-in ballot fraud, especially in Democrat strongholds in the remaining swing states on election night. Its why they panicked when Trump was about to win (95% odds to win) with huge leads in remaining states that mathematicians and analysts were saying it was impossible for Biden to catch up.
That's when they shut down the election/count and then spent days/weeks "finding" huge batches of Biden ballots from these counties. Such as the 3AM ballot dumps in Milwaukee and Detroit.
Powell never said mail in ballots weren’t used in the fraud. You are putting words in her mouth. They had to decide which tactic was best to go after and easiest to prove in court. Mail in ballots could only be proven with forensic audits in every state which they knew would never happen.
You are second guessing a legal strategy because it failed. It didn’t fail because it was the wrong or even incorrect strategy. It failed because the courts were in on the fraud.
Why would you do this?
Powell originally was on track with mail-in ballots. Then she went off the rails and getting sucked into the Qanon world and as such, kept on making more sensationalist and greater claims.
Robert Barnes, who was working alongside Powell, even said this himself. Originally, EVERYONE was focused on the mail-in ballots and there was massive pressure there to audit the signatures. This was back when a bunch of us were crowdsourcing information and the mathematical impossibilities were in the spotlight (which 100% scream mail-in ballot fraud in certain Democrat strongholds within the swing states).
The GA governor was about to let this happen, right before Powell went off the rails and started repeating the Qanon conspiracy theories. That's when GA had their easy "out" to dismiss the entire election fraud case as a wild nutjob conspiracy theory.
Overall, the entire legal fight devolved into a total mess.
Obviously, the tactic you believe they tried, didn't work. I don't see how proving a vast international communist plot to rig voting machines overseas is easier to prove than mail-in ballot fraud (which even Carter himself warned of decades ago) along with tons of information describing how mail-in ballots are easily prone to fraud.
Why even defend a failed strategy that put us in the shitty situation we are in now? IMO, all of the attention should have been 100% focused on the real and very visible fraud, which was 6-7 Democrat cities within the states that stopped the count kicked out observers, covered the windows, and then spent days/weeks finding batches of 200,000 ballots all for Biden and nothing down ballot.
We do have evidence of this, including the polling location that kicked out all the workers and pulled suitcases out with ballots and started counting them at 2AM when no one was around. We have witnesses who said they say thousands of mail-in ballots with zero folds, perfectly marked just Biden, with nothing down ballot. We have witnesses who saw them trucking in caches of ballots late at night with zero chain of custody after they stopped the count.
And we went from Trump about to claim victory and being ahead so big that election mathematicians were saying it was nearly impossible for Biden to catch up, to them spending up to a week coordinated between states to keep dumping ballots until they barely eeked out a lead and called it.
It's that simple and its 100% DAMN obvious. Why discredit that by trying to argue claims of communist vote swapping, secret satellites changing the votes, and foreign powers hacking into the voting machines?
What would you do if you were sued for a billion dollars and knowing nothing you would say would matter?
Why not? Powell previously stated that she HOPES Dominion sues her so that they could open themselves up to discovery.
Well, she got her wish. They did sue her for defamation. If Powell's claims were 100% true, and she has the receipts and evidence like she claims, why isn't she presenting it?
She has made boastful speeches before how she will never back down. Yet here she is backing down and backtracking. Now saying "oh, it was just my opinion, and I didn't expect the public to immediately take it as a fact, please drop the case!"
You don’t present evidence until you are in discovery. That’s why. You sound like Tucker Carlson FFS. Others here have explained how she is not backing down or backtracking yet you ignore it in favor of believing a leftist rag like Vox. Fucking pathetic.
Again, did Powell did not publicly say she hoped that Dominion sued her for defamation so that they would open themselves up to discovery?
So why is she trying to get the case dropped so desperately? Why not proceed, let it go into discovery, and present her evidence?