She wasn't taking stuff from "Q" directly. She was taking stuff from the Qanon community and repeating it.
Such as the "seized servers showed Trump won 410 electoral votes". I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
It was repeated by some Congressman on a Zoom call, where it blew up, and then Powell re-tweeted it. She then repeated it on multiple interviews/media appearances. Even saying "I can confirm that the servers were seized but we just don't know who has them." Then after even alluded the good guys have them. Then kept repeating the "Trump won 410 electoral votes" claim.
That is just one example. Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble. Of course, when I brought it up I was shouted down as "how dare I question Powell, she's a lawyer, she would never say anything if it wasn't 100% true."
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline (with actual sources) of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"
My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation, is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"
Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did. Instead she went around repeating it in the media as if it was fact. She didn't say "well, I think there are servers that maybe were seized because I saw it on a tweet"....nope, she was repeating it like she vetted it and I remember 90% of this site creaming their pants over it.
Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez....its no wonder it got laughed out of the court room and discredited the legitimate case for fraud against the mail-in ballots.
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to. You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background? Face it, Powell got mislead and now she's trying to save her ass.
What happened to her goading on Dominion to sue her so that they could open themselves up to discovery? She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
In other words, you're fucking lying. You lie and then you run away as soon as you're challenged.
You people come in here talking shit about everybody connected with Trump that you can, and not one of you cocksuckers can even name a specific misdeed on the part of Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, and now you faggots have even moved on to Gen. Flynn.
She wasn't taking stuff from "Q" directly. She was taking stuff from the Qanon community and repeating it.
Such as the "seized servers showed Trump won 410 electoral votes". I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
It was repeated by some Congressman on a Zoom call, where it blew up, and then Powell re-tweeted it. She then repeated it on multiple interviews/media appearances. Even saying "I can confirm that the servers were seized but we just don't know who has them." Then after even alluded the good guys have them. Then kept repeating the "Trump won 410 electoral votes" claim.
That is just one example. Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble. Of course, when I brought it up I was shouted down as "how dare I question Powell, she's a lawyer, she would never say anything if it wasn't 100% true."
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Your shit is beyond suspect.
But here you go: https://patriots.win/p/11QSH1vDSC/the-seized-server-story-how-it-s/
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
I didn't say it's "100% TRutH aNd VetTed!" I said nothing you're claiming is evidence that it's false. And I am correct.
She is arguing no such fucking thing. Read the fucking post you're responding to.
It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline (with actual sources) of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"
My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation, is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"
Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did. Instead she went around repeating it in the media as if it was fact. She didn't say "well, I think there are servers that maybe were seized because I saw it on a tweet"....nope, she was repeating it like she vetted it and I remember 90% of this site creaming their pants over it.
Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez....its no wonder it got laughed out of the court room and discredited the legitimate case for fraud against the mail-in ballots.
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to. You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background? Face it, Powell got mislead and now she's trying to save her ass.
What happened to her goading on Dominion to sue her so that they could open themselves up to discovery? She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
In other words, you're fucking lying. You lie and then you run away as soon as you're challenged.
You people come in here talking shit about everybody connected with Trump that you can, and not one of you cocksuckers can even name a specific misdeed on the part of Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, and now you faggots have even moved on to Gen. Flynn.
How many usernames do you have for TD?
Aw, look how emotional you are. You can't even offer a proper rebuttal to prove me wrong. I provided what you asked.
You are no different than the leftist who screams "RACIST" to shut someone down when they say something that you don't like to hear.
What a shame.
I remember all this shit