I made a detailed post after the election outlining exactly how that hoax started and spread so far. It started from a 4chan post where someone posted an image in German, claiming that Scytl servers were seized and showed Trump won 410 electoral votes. Then some losing Republican running for Congress tweeted it out with a custom-made electoral map from one of those websites.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Its not good for a lawyer to just claim this stuff as fact without vetting it, so that's the kind of stuff that obviously got her in trouble.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
Yet here she is, saying her claims are now just opinions and the public shouldn't take them as fact.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline (with actual sources) of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"
My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation, is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"
Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did. Instead she went around repeating it in the media as if it was fact. She didn't say "well, I think there are servers that maybe were seized because I saw it on a tweet"....nope, she was repeating it like she vetted it and I remember 90% of this site creaming their pants over it.
Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez....its no wonder it got laughed out of the court room and discredited the legitimate case for fraud against the mail-in ballots.
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to. You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background? Face it, Powell got mislead and now she's trying to save her ass.
What happened to her goading on Dominion to sue her so that they could open themselves up to discovery? She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.
It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline
There is no timeline in that post.
(with actual sources)
Dead link.
Louie Gohmert making the same claims about SCYTL that Powell did. Dead link.
Quoting Louie Gohmert saying he doesn't know what to believe. No source. No link.
Copy of @MangaforCongress Tweet with electoral map showing Trump with 410 electoral votes. You don't make any connection with Sidney Powell. Did Powell pick up the map from Manga or vice-versa? Don't know, but neither means that Sidney is lying or whatever you're crying about.
Completely superfluous 2nd image of 410 electoral map. Lol.
A quote from Sidney herself that doesn't speak to the truth or falsity of what she's saying. No source. No link.
Link to interviews with Gens. McInerney and Flynn. McInerney talking about the "SCYTL raid" is the actual source of the statements made by Powell, Gohmert, et. al. (and not the reverse, as you falsely claim) Is any of it true? I don't know. And neither do you. Whatever your basis for claiming Sidney Powell didn't vet the information that came to her, you don't state it at all in that post.
of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"
As far as I know, it started in that interview with McInerney. If you have knowledge that "it started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled [sic] image in German [?] talking about 'seized surfers'" then produce a link.
Side notes:
How do you misspell an image?
If something were misspelled in German, would you even know?
You claim (a) a misspelled (b) image (c) in German, which you illustrate with a quote (d) in English.
What the hell are you talking about? Get your fucking story straight.
My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation
It does no such thing.
is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"
I didn't say that.
Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did.
Again, you have not provided a single shred of evidence to indicate that she didn't vet it. And the garbled mess you posted 3 months ago does not constitute a vetting of her claims at all.
Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez.
Never heard her say anything about satellites. By "overseas control rooms," I take it you mean SCYTL? I don't know about that, and neither do you.
And now you're saying that Hugo Chavez repeatedly rigging the vote in Venezuela is some sort of crazy, laughably stupid notion. It was and is the position of the U.S. State Dept. for around twenty years. And the Venezuelan regime was a past Dominion client. So, in one of the few of these things we're actually able to fact check, turns out Sidney is 100% correct.
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to.
This is false. There has been no trying of any matter of fact in any 2020 election case that Powell brought.
You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background?
First I've heard of that. Post a link. I'm confident the full context will show you're not being truthful.
She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
In other words, you're fucking lying. You lie and then you run away as soon as you're challenged.
You people come in here talking shit about everybody connected with Trump that you can, and not one of you cocksuckers can even name a specific misdeed on the part of Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, and now you faggots have even moved on to Gen. Flynn.
I rebutted what I could, asked for more information where I couldn't.
And your response was to proclaim yourself above having to back up your statements with any sort of verifiable fact or evidence, then to announce that you were finished with the discussion, then came right back to hurl insults and put words in my mouth.
These are the marks of a person who just got caught lying.
Repost that here. You're not alleging that anything she said is incorrect. You are, however, admitting that none of this came from Q. You're also not showing how any of the people she got this information from have anything to do with Q.
Repost your old post so we can follow the specifics of what you're saying.
Not sure how 4chan is a link between her & Qanon, either.
Has it been established that she didn't vet it? It's not established in your comments.
You're aware you're posting this comment to a discussion about a misattributed, misleading headline? Not that it was difficult, but OP demonstrated this fact.
Your shit is beyond suspect.
But here you go: https://patriots.win/p/11QSH1vDSC/the-seized-server-story-how-it-s/
Please, entertain me, tell me how I'm completely wrong and how Powell's claim is 100% truth and vetted....even though she's now arguing her claims are opinion.
I didn't say it's "100% TRutH aNd VetTed!" I said nothing you're claiming is evidence that it's false. And I am correct.
She is arguing no such fucking thing. Read the fucking post you're responding to.
It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline (with actual sources) of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"
My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation, is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"
Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did. Instead she went around repeating it in the media as if it was fact. She didn't say "well, I think there are servers that maybe were seized because I saw it on a tweet"....nope, she was repeating it like she vetted it and I remember 90% of this site creaming their pants over it.
Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez....its no wonder it got laughed out of the court room and discredited the legitimate case for fraud against the mail-in ballots.
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to. You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background? Face it, Powell got mislead and now she's trying to save her ass.
What happened to her goading on Dominion to sue her so that they could open themselves up to discovery? She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.
Tits or gtfo
There is no timeline in that post.
Dead link.
Louie Gohmert making the same claims about SCYTL that Powell did. Dead link.
Quoting Louie Gohmert saying he doesn't know what to believe. No source. No link.
Copy of @MangaforCongress Tweet with electoral map showing Trump with 410 electoral votes. You don't make any connection with Sidney Powell. Did Powell pick up the map from Manga or vice-versa? Don't know, but neither means that Sidney is lying or whatever you're crying about.
Completely superfluous 2nd image of 410 electoral map. Lol.
A quote from Sidney herself that doesn't speak to the truth or falsity of what she's saying. No source. No link.
Link to interviews with Gens. McInerney and Flynn. McInerney talking about the "SCYTL raid" is the actual source of the statements made by Powell, Gohmert, et. al. (and not the reverse, as you falsely claim) Is any of it true? I don't know. And neither do you. Whatever your basis for claiming Sidney Powell didn't vet the information that came to her, you don't state it at all in that post.
As far as I know, it started in that interview with McInerney. If you have knowledge that "it started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled [sic] image in German [?] talking about 'seized surfers'" then produce a link.
Side notes:
How do you misspell an image?
If something were misspelled in German, would you even know?
You claim (a) a misspelled (b) image (c) in German, which you illustrate with a quote (d) in English.
What the hell are you talking about? Get your fucking story straight.
It does no such thing.
I didn't say that.
Again, you have not provided a single shred of evidence to indicate that she didn't vet it. And the garbled mess you posted 3 months ago does not constitute a vetting of her claims at all.
Never heard her say anything about satellites. By "overseas control rooms," I take it you mean SCYTL? I don't know about that, and neither do you.
And now you're saying that Hugo Chavez repeatedly rigging the vote in Venezuela is some sort of crazy, laughably stupid notion. It was and is the position of the U.S. State Dept. for around twenty years. And the Venezuelan regime was a past Dominion client. So, in one of the few of these things we're actually able to fact check, turns out Sidney is 100% correct.
This is false. There has been no trying of any matter of fact in any 2020 election case that Powell brought.
First I've heard of that. Post a link. I'm confident the full context will show you're not being truthful.
Or to get it moved. You're not telling the truth.
Yawn. I can already tell you are a person that lacks free thinking and an open mind. No matter what I share, you'll defend Powell vehemently and make whatever excuses necessary, because you obviously fell for it and don't want to admit you are wrong.
I already dealt with hundreds of people like you, who assured me that Powell was going to bring down Biden and the deep state and how every word she utters is gospel.
In other words, you're fucking lying. You lie and then you run away as soon as you're challenged.
You people come in here talking shit about everybody connected with Trump that you can, and not one of you cocksuckers can even name a specific misdeed on the part of Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, and now you faggots have even moved on to Gen. Flynn.
How many usernames do you have for TD?
Aw, look how emotional you are. You can't even offer a proper rebuttal to prove me wrong. I provided what you asked.
You are no different than the leftist who screams "RACIST" to shut someone down when they say something that you don't like to hear.
What a shame.
I rebutted what I could, asked for more information where I couldn't.
And your response was to proclaim yourself above having to back up your statements with any sort of verifiable fact or evidence, then to announce that you were finished with the discussion, then came right back to hurl insults and put words in my mouth.
These are the marks of a person who just got caught lying.