460
Comments (74)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
WU_HAN_FRU 1 point ago +1 / -0

It absolutely is evidence. In that post that I linked, I provided A DETAILED timeline

There is no timeline in that post.

(with actual sources)

  1. Dead link.

  2. Louie Gohmert making the same claims about SCYTL that Powell did. Dead link.

  3. Quoting Louie Gohmert saying he doesn't know what to believe. No source. No link.

  4. Copy of @MangaforCongress Tweet with electoral map showing Trump with 410 electoral votes. You don't make any connection with Sidney Powell. Did Powell pick up the map from Manga or vice-versa? Don't know, but neither means that Sidney is lying or whatever you're crying about.

  5. Completely superfluous 2nd image of 410 electoral map. Lol.

  6. A quote from Sidney herself that doesn't speak to the truth or falsity of what she's saying. No source. No link.

  7. Link to interviews with Gens. McInerney and Flynn. McInerney talking about the "SCYTL raid" is the actual source of the statements made by Powell, Gohmert, et. al. (and not the reverse, as you falsely claim) Is any of it true? I don't know. And neither do you. Whatever your basis for claiming Sidney Powell didn't vet the information that came to her, you don't state it at all in that post.

of how exactly the "seized server" claim started. It started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled image in German talking about "seized surfers"

As far as I know, it started in that interview with McInerney. If you have knowledge that "it started by a poorly written, random post on a Q-related chan site with a mis-spelled [sic] image in German [?] talking about 'seized surfers'" then produce a link.

Side notes:

  1. How do you misspell an image?

  2. If something were misspelled in German, would you even know?

  3. You claim (a) a misspelled (b) image (c) in German, which you illustrate with a quote (d) in English.

What the hell are you talking about? Get your fucking story straight.

My information that breaks down the claim being disinformation

It does no such thing.

is much better than you saying "nuh uh! you can't prove its not false!"

I didn't say that.

Regardless, it was irresponsible of Powell to not research and vet that claim like I did.

Again, you have not provided a single shred of evidence to indicate that she didn't vet it. And the garbled mess you posted 3 months ago does not constitute a vetting of her claims at all.

Her lawsuit was a total jumbled mess of all kinds of different claims from satellites, overseas control rooms, communist vote-rigging plots from Hugo Chavez.

Never heard her say anything about satellites. By "overseas control rooms," I take it you mean SCYTL? I don't know about that, and neither do you.

And now you're saying that Hugo Chavez repeatedly rigging the vote in Venezuela is some sort of crazy, laughably stupid notion. It was and is the position of the U.S. State Dept. for around twenty years. And the Venezuelan regime was a past Dominion client. So, in one of the few of these things we're actually able to fact check, turns out Sidney is 100% correct.

Sorry, but it doesn't work like that in court. You have to prove your position and claims. And Powell clearly isn't able to.

This is false. There has been no trying of any matter of fact in any 2020 election case that Powell brought.

You do realize that her lead witness was caught lying about his credentials and background?

First I've heard of that. Post a link. I'm confident the full context will show you're not being truthful.

She got what she wanted, now she's trying to get the judge to dismiss the suit.

Or to get it moved. You're not telling the truth.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0