we had evidence. We saw evidence. The court refused to see it. You saw it yourself. You saw the Georgia video of the ballots in suitcases. You saw the video with audio with of the price it costs to have someone get paid to shift votes. You saw the video of the vans pulling in with the ballots after it was closed.
You saw a court say we saw nothing. Case dismissed. she had the goods.
Not really the evidence that Powell was claiming. She was claiming she "had proof" that votes were switched. Her lawsuit contained no proof. Just "witnesses" who claimed that the machines could be accessed by foreign countries, unfortunately, that's not proof that votes were altered.
So what is proof to you? I believe she showed a great deal of proof. I work with statistics and proof to me is not the same as what you may believe. Outcomes that are not possible is proof.
If she knows something and can not show it legally without discovery then that is proof. Did you ever wonder why not one case anywhere in the country went to discovery? If I was her I would drop everything and run because the courts are compromised and she did not know that until now.
Paper that she illegally obtained and knows is printed from another country but she can not legally have it without discovery is proof that she could only supply in court.
Expert witnesses will provide other proof because she sent teams out with cameras to find that AZ votes showed abandon lots for homes with 90 people registered all democrat and all voting Biden on that lot.
I'm referencing in to what proof holds up in the courts, especially when it comes to such a huge factor as the results of the 2020 election. Powell mainly argues that "Dominion is involved with flipping and changing the votes."
You are simply going to need more proof than "the voting machines could have been hacked" and witnesses that say they could be hacked.
The Democrat's tried to argue this in relation to Trump's win, and it doesn't work. You need more than "the machines can be hacked."
We do have lots of evidence and proof, in what you mentioned, including statistical anomalies and impossibilities. When you put it all together, with the fact they "shut down the election" right before Trump's apparent victory and then spent days/weeks harvesting and "finding" large swaths of ballots that were 98% for Biden....we have video evidence of them kicking out polling workers then pulling out hidden suitcases with ballots and counting them with only 3 workers around at 1AM. We have witnesses who said they were trucking in mail-in ballots late at night with no chain of custody, that had no folds, and were all perfectly marked for Biden with nothing down ballot.
And then we have the fact they still refuse to let us perform forensic audits on the ballots and signatures. There are happy to let us do "hand recounts" (which by the way, should have revealed a discrepancy with Powell and Lin Wood's claim that huge amounts of votes were flipped by the machines) or let us audit the machines. But they definitely don't want us auditing the signatures for some reason.
But the issue seems to be with mail-in ballot fraud, mostly isolated to 7 Democrat counties within the swing states that shut down. If it wasn't for that, Trump would have won in a landslide.
And the legal response was horrible. We had Powell going off the rails making sensationalized claims along with repeating Qanon-type conspiracy theories such as seized servers and gun battles between the CIA and military (which damaged her credibility and the credibility of the claim that the election was stolen) and then Rudy who didn't practice law since the early 90s, wasn't familiar with legal terms, and even said in court that "he wasn't arguing fraud."
"You are simply going to need more proof than "the voting machines could have been hacked" and witnesses that say they could be hacked."
And she claimed that she had witnesses to the voter switch on the machine without a hack. That she has proof to corroborate their testimony.
Those people got cold feet for obvious reasons. The fact that you are saying what you are saying believes those people should go to CNN and state what they know? Maybe go to the FBI? How about tell an elected official?
What do you think those witnesses should do other than shut up and hide?
Not sure you are aware but every case in the US was shut down and never got to present? That is conspiracy fact.
Fact is she had witness of ballot boxes being dropped of in Georgia in the middle of the night when they should not have been allowed in the building. Later video evidence shows up with the shipping doc to support the witness. FBI? Does nothing.
How about the folks caught on video and audio in Georgia talking about getting paid to add votes for Biden? FBI? We know who those people are.
you did not read what I wrote. She presented evidence and filed a case when you did not help at all.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
we had evidence. We saw evidence. The court refused to see it. You saw it yourself. You saw the Georgia video of the ballots in suitcases. You saw the video with audio with of the price it costs to have someone get paid to shift votes. You saw the video of the vans pulling in with the ballots after it was closed.
You saw a court say we saw nothing. Case dismissed. she had the goods.
Not really the evidence that Powell was claiming. She was claiming she "had proof" that votes were switched. Her lawsuit contained no proof. Just "witnesses" who claimed that the machines could be accessed by foreign countries, unfortunately, that's not proof that votes were altered.
So what is proof to you? I believe she showed a great deal of proof. I work with statistics and proof to me is not the same as what you may believe. Outcomes that are not possible is proof.
If she knows something and can not show it legally without discovery then that is proof. Did you ever wonder why not one case anywhere in the country went to discovery? If I was her I would drop everything and run because the courts are compromised and she did not know that until now.
Paper that she illegally obtained and knows is printed from another country but she can not legally have it without discovery is proof that she could only supply in court.
Expert witnesses will provide other proof because she sent teams out with cameras to find that AZ votes showed abandon lots for homes with 90 people registered all democrat and all voting Biden on that lot.
So what is proof to you?
I'm referencing in to what proof holds up in the courts, especially when it comes to such a huge factor as the results of the 2020 election. Powell mainly argues that "Dominion is involved with flipping and changing the votes."
You are simply going to need more proof than "the voting machines could have been hacked" and witnesses that say they could be hacked.
The Democrat's tried to argue this in relation to Trump's win, and it doesn't work. You need more than "the machines can be hacked."
We do have lots of evidence and proof, in what you mentioned, including statistical anomalies and impossibilities. When you put it all together, with the fact they "shut down the election" right before Trump's apparent victory and then spent days/weeks harvesting and "finding" large swaths of ballots that were 98% for Biden....we have video evidence of them kicking out polling workers then pulling out hidden suitcases with ballots and counting them with only 3 workers around at 1AM. We have witnesses who said they were trucking in mail-in ballots late at night with no chain of custody, that had no folds, and were all perfectly marked for Biden with nothing down ballot.
And then we have the fact they still refuse to let us perform forensic audits on the ballots and signatures. There are happy to let us do "hand recounts" (which by the way, should have revealed a discrepancy with Powell and Lin Wood's claim that huge amounts of votes were flipped by the machines) or let us audit the machines. But they definitely don't want us auditing the signatures for some reason.
But the issue seems to be with mail-in ballot fraud, mostly isolated to 7 Democrat counties within the swing states that shut down. If it wasn't for that, Trump would have won in a landslide.
And the legal response was horrible. We had Powell going off the rails making sensationalized claims along with repeating Qanon-type conspiracy theories such as seized servers and gun battles between the CIA and military (which damaged her credibility and the credibility of the claim that the election was stolen) and then Rudy who didn't practice law since the early 90s, wasn't familiar with legal terms, and even said in court that "he wasn't arguing fraud."
Ultimately it was all a disaster.
"You are simply going to need more proof than "the voting machines could have been hacked" and witnesses that say they could be hacked."
And she claimed that she had witnesses to the voter switch on the machine without a hack. That she has proof to corroborate their testimony.
Those people got cold feet for obvious reasons. The fact that you are saying what you are saying believes those people should go to CNN and state what they know? Maybe go to the FBI? How about tell an elected official?
What do you think those witnesses should do other than shut up and hide?
Not sure you are aware but every case in the US was shut down and never got to present? That is conspiracy fact.
Fact is she had witness of ballot boxes being dropped of in Georgia in the middle of the night when they should not have been allowed in the building. Later video evidence shows up with the shipping doc to support the witness. FBI? Does nothing.
How about the folks caught on video and audio in Georgia talking about getting paid to add votes for Biden? FBI? We know who those people are.
That was not her evidence, someone else found all of that. Sydney herself doesn't have any goods.
Not to mention she had so many typos and grammatical errors in those crappy ass lawsuits of hers that an elementary school student would laugh.
you did not read what I wrote. She presented evidence and filed a case when you did not help at all.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
TR