posted ago by leatherbottom ago by leatherbottom +7 / -1

I heard on Scott Adams' podcast that her dominion defense is basically "no reasonable person would believe the claims made". Is there any more about this? Scott is fantastic but I would be shocked if that's what it's come to.

Can't find any updates amongst all the Islamic terror shooting threads.

Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Jbsmoover 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because it's easier to defend a defamation suit on simple "I was just talking shit" 1st Amendment grounds than it is to force the court to find that Dominion was actually a massive vote-stealing scam (which you will have a very hard time with no matter how much evidence you might present).

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

but she herself said she WOULD gladly go to court and prove that they did in fact steal the election. now she's trying to get out of it...