I heard on Scott Adams' podcast that her dominion defense is basically "no reasonable person would believe the claims made". Is there any more about this? Scott is fantastic but I would be shocked if that's what it's come to.
Can't find any updates amongst all the Islamic terror shooting threads.
It's the fastest way out of the lawsuit nothing more. Non-legal minds will read too much into it similar to "Fox is entertainment not news" and same as Alex Jones defense. Yes truth is an affirmative defense, but the proper legal way out is to get out as a Defendant as quick as possible. Ignore all the bluster and Bullshit.
Not to mention you're allowed to make every claim or defense, so there's no reason not to try the one that will get the case dismissed quickly.
do we ignore HER bluster and bullshit from now on too?
how about all the times she went on fox and claimed dominion stole the election and she had proof? how about when she insinuated that some servers in germany were captured and may be held 'by the good guys'?
or how about when SHE HERSELF said she welcomed the lawsuit against her because it would give her a chance to prove her accusations against dominion in the court of law with discovery? now she's trying to avoid the fight and get it dismissed? so i guess she was full of shit when she said that, and it was all bluster?
and she's trying to get it dismissed to avoid the court case she herself claimed to welcome, by making the argument that no reasonable person would believe her... so when do we all just finally start ignoring HER 'bluster and bullshit'? because her legal defense to get out of the case she once claimed she'd use to take down dominion, is by literally saying that only unreasonable people would believe her claims at face value...
but you don't seem to be picking up on any of this...