I heard on Scott Adams' podcast that her dominion defense is basically "no reasonable person would believe the claims made". Is there any more about this? Scott is fantastic but I would be shocked if that's what it's come to.
Can't find any updates amongst all the Islamic terror shooting threads.
That is exactly what it is.
ok but why is she stating that no reasonable person would've took her claims seriously... in a FILE FOR DISMISSAL, after having ran her mouth, saying she welcomed a lawsuit and would use discovery to prove her accusations against dominion in court? now she's trying to get it dismissed and get out of court? by saying nobody reasonable would've believed her when she went on air and accused them of stealing the election?
and in your mind none of that seems fishy. ok gotcha.