Our elections were made subjective so they can always be controlled. All they had to do was make sure the software allowed enough errors to where sufficient ballots to decide any given election would need to be adjudicated; then put compromised adjudicators in a few key counting locations. All of that legally allowed adjudication is entirely subjective, so there could never be any legal recourse against it's effect on an election outcome. It's a perfect crime really; we are not dealing with tyrants who are dumb.
I remember linking hereistheevidence.com to some leftist asking for ‘more than just one’ piece of evidence. He ended up saying it was essentially too much, and that he wouldn’t read any more of it because it was “likely all incorrect.” The idiocy of them is stunning.
I've always felt there were so many different types of fraud simply to overwhelm us and make it impossible for people who are not us to even comprehend it. It was like we were reporting a bigfoot sighting, riding on nessie with a ufo hovering in the sky while the sun rises in the west and pigs begin to fly.
While there certainly was an enormous amount of fraud in the 2020 election, it seems clear to me that there was little centralized illegal activity.
What happened was basically grassroots fraud. While people were taught how to administer an election and tabulate votes, they were also taught why they should NOT do certain things, because it would lead to bad data.
So, of course, the ones who wanted to cheat were taught how to cheat, and they did.
Theres some coordination. Maybe not at an national level but definitely at a state level. Not perfect but still there. Especially after that Times article, there was significant coordination.
the truth is they don't want evidence when they ask for a source, they're just making an appeal to authority and assuming you won't have one because in their mind that means they win
https://www.theprofessorsrecord.com/
Also includes links to:
https://hereistheevidence.com/ https://www.electionevidence.com/ https://navarroreport.com/ http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm
You rock OP! Keep on doing what your doing!
o7
Thank you Fren :)
The quality content I have been waiting for today
Our elections were made subjective so they can always be controlled. All they had to do was make sure the software allowed enough errors to where sufficient ballots to decide any given election would need to be adjudicated; then put compromised adjudicators in a few key counting locations. All of that legally allowed adjudication is entirely subjective, so there could never be any legal recourse against it's effect on an election outcome. It's a perfect crime really; we are not dealing with tyrants who are dumb.
I remember linking hereistheevidence.com to some leftist asking for ‘more than just one’ piece of evidence. He ended up saying it was essentially too much, and that he wouldn’t read any more of it because it was “likely all incorrect.” The idiocy of them is stunning.
To quote myself from another thread earlier today
I've always felt there were so many different types of fraud simply to overwhelm us and make it impossible for people who are not us to even comprehend it. It was like we were reporting a bigfoot sighting, riding on nessie with a ufo hovering in the sky while the sun rises in the west and pigs begin to fly.
They actually treat eyewitnesses as if they were making Bigfoot claims.
Correct observation, that
Thats the idea. Bury the truth in a lot of disinfo
While there certainly was an enormous amount of fraud in the 2020 election, it seems clear to me that there was little centralized illegal activity.
What happened was basically grassroots fraud. While people were taught how to administer an election and tabulate votes, they were also taught why they should NOT do certain things, because it would lead to bad data.
So, of course, the ones who wanted to cheat were taught how to cheat, and they did.
The Post Office helped facilitate most of the fraud
Theres some coordination. Maybe not at an national level but definitely at a state level. Not perfect but still there. Especially after that Times article, there was significant coordination.
the truth is they don't want evidence when they ask for a source, they're just making an appeal to authority and assuming you won't have one because in their mind that means they win
If it's not a .gov address, then it's automatically debunked in their head
OP fighting the good fight still. Gives me chills. Hell yeah you glorious bastard!
I've finally been called a glorious bastard. Wiping a tear from my eye Fren.
These links should be stickied or in the sidebar