5661
posted ago by Doggos ago by Doggos +5660 / --1

I understand most of us don't care about Reddit anymore, but I can't resist an opportunity to shine more light onto things that Reddit are trying to keep quiet.

I might have some details wrong, but here's the TL;DR:

  • A moderator of r/ukpolitics linked to an article from the Spectator, which "contained a three-word mention, in passing, of a minor British public figure, expelled from both the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party" (not knowing this was a Reddit admin)

  • The moderator was permanently suspended for "doxxing"

  • They later discovered that Reddit had hired this individual from the article, and therefore considered it doxxing.

  • Turns out, if you mention this minor public figure (turned Reddit admin) anywhere on the site, you will get permanently banned.

... which isn't the bad part. The new Reddit admin (Aimee Challenor) allegedly:

  • is married to a literal, self-admitted pedophile who writes sex stories about kids (tweet: https://i.imgur.com/j2GXHtW.jpg)
  • hired her father as elections agent after he was charged for holding a 10 year old girl captive in his "torture den" where he electrocuted her while playing out his sadomasochistic fantasies ("subjected the child to a campaign of abuse which included tying her from a beam, whipping her and giving her electric shocks.")
  • started off as just a volunteer moderator for child/teen-focused subreddits before becoming a Reddit employee

Reddit's banning anyone who mentions the new admins name. Many large subreddits are going private in protest of the admins. The admins just put out a statement clarifying the ban policy but no comment on why they hired (and still are employing) an allegedly avid supporter of child rapists. More subreddits are continuing to close. Could be interesting!

Comments (756)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
CloakAndDagger 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're not using correct "logic" in the mathematical sense of the word. All I said was that the two concepts mean two different things.

Gay = someone attracted to the same sex (Who do I like?)

Trans = someone think he's the opposite sex (Who am I?)

That's all, nothing more or less. The two are not mutually exclusive, for example as you said, a biological guy, calling himself a chick and sucking dick would be both gay and trans (Although he would consider "herself" straight, but that's beside the point).

But two guys, aware that they're guys and content with it, having sex would be gay, but not trans.

And a guy calling himself a chick but having sex with another chick would be trans, but not gay.

You can have one or the other, neither or both. Just like how you could be white, straight, neither or both. In my example I brought up Scott Presler who is not trans.

Now, there is an overlap and sadly, many gays and even straights take up a "trans identity" to try and seem even more unique in a world that rewards participation over merit more and more every day.

2
icockmyglock 2 points ago +3 / -1

Homosexuality and transsexuality are both perversions of the human sexual psyche that lead to the same place of dead end genetics. One is merely the inept and incomplete form of perversion while the other is the completion of the original perversion taken to its end. You might want to think they're different, but they're really not.

You might think you're using logic to prove your point, but there is no logic devoting one's self to and preferring evolutionary dead end behaviors. Homosexuality was merely the nose in the tent. Homos are desperate to differentiate their selves from trans people, but deep down they know they're perverts.

-1
CloakAndDagger -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. It is also highly ideologized and devoid of any objective substance to back it up.

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +2 / -1

devoid of any objective substance to back it up

Typical Redditor bullshit. You have to go back.

-1
CloakAndDagger -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's okay. Later in life you'll learn that saying "because I said so" or "because I think so" doesn't count as proof. Your ilk is no better than the twitterati "feelings over facts" crowd.