1019
Comments (162)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Wexit-Delecto 4 points ago +4 / -0

The masks are fucking shit and they don’t stop the spread of anything. Florida and South Dakota have the same rates as any lockdown mask state.

You wear what you want I wear what I want.

0
NeverTwitterer 0 points ago +2 / -2

Would you fly on an airline that required sick people that are coughing a ton to wear a mask?

The problem isn't masks, its the government mandates that defy common sense + sheep panic masking and mask shaming/virtue signaling.

3
Wexit-Delecto 3 points ago +3 / -0

No I wouldn’t fly that airline. This whole episode has renewed my love of the open road.

-4
DeplorableChumpPede -4 points ago +2 / -6

I think we at least have to acknowledge that it stops the large droplets which reduces viral load in the case of exposure.

I honestly don’t care if you wear a mask or not, but I respect a private business owner’s right to demand that as a requirement for service.

But I was okay with business owners not baking a cake too...

When you start forcing people to serve you when it debatably puts them at risk (either physically or morally), you start to cross the line.

2
Wexit-Delecto 2 points ago +3 / -1

There is no “force.” If you don’t want the public in your store, don’t open one.

If we’re going to allow businesses to arbitrarily discriminate against anyone on any basis then we need antitrust law restored.

-5
DeplorableChumpPede -5 points ago +1 / -6

C’mon man....you clearly are confused as fuck.

First of all, it’s not arbitrary and hardly what would be classified as discrimination. Second, you open a business to make money...you can set the amount of risk you’re willing to take. Example, if you have a business cutting down trees and a potential client wants you to cut something down beyond your capabilities, you can say no. And antitrust? lol

2
Wexit-Delecto 2 points ago +2 / -0

First of all, it’s not arbitrary

You’re right. The mask mandate exactly divides conservatives concerned with the precedent being set and simpering leftists concerned with seeking peer approval.

Second, you open a business to make money...you can set the amount of risk you’re willing to take. Example, if you have a business cutting down trees and a potential client wants you to cut something down beyond your capabilities, you can say no.

It’s not beyond anyone’s capability to serve a maskless person.

And antitrust? lol

Without it, there’s no competition. Without competition it’s meaningless to say “so? You can just shop elsewhere.”

If you can’t see the connection maybe don’t go around calling other people confused?