There's a HUGE difference in executing "trespass" for a refusal to comply with nonsensical "health policy", which explicitly mentions the right of exemption(but they don't enforce that part), and sexual favors and/or forcing someone to reject their religion.
This is so easy to understand but, some how, absolute RETARDS think that this is comparable...
It's about these bad faith arguments that propose a line of thinking that doesn't match with their own set forth policy they're attempting to enforce.
It's about context and equal protection under the law. Hence why we don't see a christian store banning muslims and churches forbidding black people from attending service.
This is exceptionally outrageous to think that this is somehow acceptable when it comes to disability and your natural rights to breathe normally. What the fuck is wrong with this place?
"Muh freedom is important! Better put that hijab on cuz it's muh private property hurrdurr"
And businesses already segregate. Chinese restaurants that only hire Chinese staff, for instance.
It's their business. It's not your business. And your power-to-the-government philosophy is why Hooters will be filled with elderly trannies who identify as young attractive girls in 5 years.
What is soooooo hard to grasp in this idea where you're not sick, and can't wear a mask that you be treated the exact same way as you were treated yesterday?
I. E
Go to store, they serve you. Go to same store tomorrow and they refuse because new policy.
New policy explicitly mentions exemptions because... Wait for it... It is ILLEGAL to discriminate based on the criteria set in the 14th amendment.
Did you see the Chinese store explicitly refuse service to anyone that isn't Chinese?
Also, the constitution is a document to LIMIT the power of government... It is the people's document.
You equating the constitution with "power to the government philosophy" means you either can't read or have incredibly poor reading comprehension.
Either way, it's a shame.
Riiiight... Taking away the 1st amendment and giving the government the power to run your business, LIMITS the power of government. Somehow.
Derp
Freedom of association. It's in the first amendment, can you not read it? A business has every right to hang a NO BLACKS or NO WHITES or NO GINGERS sign on their door. And if I want a MASKS REQUIRED or NO MASKS ALLOWED policy, it's none of your business and it's not your decision.
You're just as bad as the liberals. "I believe in freedom... except in these cases where I don't think you should be free". Fuck you, and your boomer, civnat, opinion.
Go back to the 1700's then.
Sorry that you're not allowed to ban jews and blacks in the name of "freedom" all the while pissing and moaning at the censorship of conservatives.
Absolutely dumbfounded at the sheer lack of self awareness in these "debates" in favor of discriminations based on the "science" of the chinese virus.
I'm not pissing and moaning about censorship, I'm pissing and moaning that it's not one way or the other. Either you can discriminate against everything, or discriminate against nothing. The only irony here is that morons like you think that allowing only certain kinds of discrimination isn't playing right into the enemy's hands. Ever notice how all the exceptions they carve out only benefit them? People like you are exactly why this country is going to shit; you're literally too stupid to understand the long term consequences of your political philosophy, and worse, your arrogance makes you completely blind to any arguments indicating otherwise.
You're not free to do what you want on other people's property, civnat fag. And yes, that should include them denying you service due to race, religion, or whatever.
Still outside throwing your impotent little tantrum in the street?
You obviously can't even grasp what a right is.
You don't have a right to come on my property without my permission. I'm sorry you boot lickers are too stupid to understand that. I do have property rights and freedom of association rights. I'm sorry you boot lickers are too stupid to understand that.
Keep throwing your little toddler tantrum, out on the sidewalk where you're allowed to be, but you can't take my rights.
Says the maniac pretending to take away the natural right of breathing from anyone who is on his fantasy land.
But, please continue on about how you're the real victim in all of this, sire.... Surely you can express your feelings of agony and misery better than crying on here to me about how those pesky pesky servants of yours refuse to comply with your rules?
Please go on about how the distinctive differences no longer matter and that whatever conjured up narrative that suits his majesty is just.
When you cut through all your bullshit.. at the end of the day, you're telling me how to breathe and calling me the tyrant
It's time to stop living in pretend world, sally. Time to put your dollies and the little ponies away now. It's clean up time.
I don't have to cry about pesky boot lickers refusing to follow my rules on my property. That's why you're out on the sidewalk throwing a meaningless impotent little boot licking toddler tantrum.
Your inane gibberish about masks and breathing doesn't take away my property rights or my 1st amendment rights. I'll tell you have to wear one, or you can't wear one, or I'll insist you put on a clown wig if you want to come in. That's my right. You, boot licker, don't get to control me and my property isn't your property.
Come to terms with it, because your little sidewalk tantrums don't change anything.
Wrong.
You don't get to just be a segregationist because the media and troll forum posts pretend otherwise because it's politically convenient at the time.
If you don't see why and why this was dealt with HUNDREDS OF YEARS AGO, no one can help you. You are lost.
You're lost. Freedom of association is no less important than freedom of speech or the right to self defense.
Or would you like to bake the cake, bigot?
He's just completely confused. Giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's 95 years old and having a hard time with this.
Still have a hard time with "Bake the cake bigot" and "wax my balls" where is the line?
There's a HUGE difference in executing "trespass" for a refusal to comply with nonsensical "health policy", which explicitly mentions the right of exemption(but they don't enforce that part), and sexual favors and/or forcing someone to reject their religion.
This is so easy to understand but, some how, absolute RETARDS think that this is comparable...
So.. A muslims buisness can ban jews and a christian business can ban muslims?
My religious belief tells me black skin comes from the devil, can my buisness exclude them?
I dont see how they dont coincide.
Im not defending the bake my cake bigot. Im just saying all laws have loopholes and no concept is perfect.
It's about these bad faith arguments that propose a line of thinking that doesn't match with their own set forth policy they're attempting to enforce.
It's about context and equal protection under the law. Hence why we don't see a christian store banning muslims and churches forbidding black people from attending service.
This is exceptionally outrageous to think that this is somehow acceptable when it comes to disability and your natural rights to breathe normally. What the fuck is wrong with this place?
"Muh freedom is important! Better put that hijab on cuz it's muh private property hurrdurr"
1st amendment, learn it.
And businesses already segregate. Chinese restaurants that only hire Chinese staff, for instance.
It's their business. It's not your business. And your power-to-the-government philosophy is why Hooters will be filled with elderly trannies who identify as young attractive girls in 5 years.
What is soooooo hard to grasp in this idea where you're not sick, and can't wear a mask that you be treated the exact same way as you were treated yesterday?
I. E
Go to store, they serve you. Go to same store tomorrow and they refuse because new policy.
New policy explicitly mentions exemptions because... Wait for it... It is ILLEGAL to discriminate based on the criteria set in the 14th amendment.
Did you see the Chinese store explicitly refuse service to anyone that isn't Chinese?
Also, the constitution is a document to LIMIT the power of government... It is the people's document.
You equating the constitution with "power to the government philosophy" means you either can't read or have incredibly poor reading comprehension. Either way, it's a shame.
Riiiight... Taking away the 1st amendment and giving the government the power to run your business, LIMITS the power of government. Somehow.
Derp
Freedom of association. It's in the first amendment, can you not read it? A business has every right to hang a NO BLACKS or NO WHITES or NO GINGERS sign on their door. And if I want a MASKS REQUIRED or NO MASKS ALLOWED policy, it's none of your business and it's not your decision.
Son, you have the reading comprehension of a syrian refugee. And an understanding of freedom like one...
Please point to the store with the "no blacks allowed sign".....
You're just as bad as the liberals. "I believe in freedom... except in these cases where I don't think you should be free". Fuck you, and your boomer, civnat, opinion.
LMAO.
Go back to the 1700's then. Sorry that you're not allowed to ban jews and blacks in the name of "freedom" all the while pissing and moaning at the censorship of conservatives.
Absolutely dumbfounded at the sheer lack of self awareness in these "debates" in favor of discriminations based on the "science" of the chinese virus.
I'm not pissing and moaning about censorship, I'm pissing and moaning that it's not one way or the other. Either you can discriminate against everything, or discriminate against nothing. The only irony here is that morons like you think that allowing only certain kinds of discrimination isn't playing right into the enemy's hands. Ever notice how all the exceptions they carve out only benefit them? People like you are exactly why this country is going to shit; you're literally too stupid to understand the long term consequences of your political philosophy, and worse, your arrogance makes you completely blind to any arguments indicating otherwise.
This is you!
"I believe in freedom! Except in these cases where I dont think you should be free".
Referring to being forced to cover your face?? You mean how you don't think you should not be free to breathe normally??
Are you that daft you don't see how stupid you just made yourself look?
You're not free to do what you want on other people's property, civnat fag. And yes, that should include them denying you service due to race, religion, or whatever.
Thanks for clarifying the point that it appears you actually DON'T have the infinity private property rights your pretending to have.
Turns out that there ARE limits to what "private property" means. Take a walk and read a book or two please.
Still outside throwing your impotent little tantrum in the street?
You obviously can't even grasp what a right is.
You don't have a right to come on my property without my permission. I'm sorry you boot lickers are too stupid to understand that. I do have property rights and freedom of association rights. I'm sorry you boot lickers are too stupid to understand that.
Keep throwing your little toddler tantrum, out on the sidewalk where you're allowed to be, but you can't take my rights.
Says the maniac pretending to take away the natural right of breathing from anyone who is on his fantasy land.
But, please continue on about how you're the real victim in all of this, sire.... Surely you can express your feelings of agony and misery better than crying on here to me about how those pesky pesky servants of yours refuse to comply with your rules?
Please go on about how the distinctive differences no longer matter and that whatever conjured up narrative that suits his majesty is just.
When you cut through all your bullshit.. at the end of the day, you're telling me how to breathe and calling me the tyrant
It's time to stop living in pretend world, sally. Time to put your dollies and the little ponies away now. It's clean up time.
I don't have to cry about pesky boot lickers refusing to follow my rules on my property. That's why you're out on the sidewalk throwing a meaningless impotent little boot licking toddler tantrum.
Your inane gibberish about masks and breathing doesn't take away my property rights or my 1st amendment rights. I'll tell you have to wear one, or you can't wear one, or I'll insist you put on a clown wig if you want to come in. That's my right. You, boot licker, don't get to control me and my property isn't your property.
Come to terms with it, because your little sidewalk tantrums don't change anything.
Is it the breathing part that bothers you or that you just don't have the ultimate control you keep pretending you have?