bUsInEsSeS CaN ReQuIrE CuStOmErS To dO WhAtEvEr tHeY WaNt bEcAuSe tHeY'Re pRiVaTe
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (162)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Self ownership only applies in public spaces and your property. Otherwise, the property rights of someone else's property override your ability to exercise your right of self-ownership. They can't force you to do something, but they can deny you access to their property if you don't voluntarily comply.
Yeah, no, from the libertarian perspective, self-ownership is a natural right and therefore inalienable. You don't get to decide when the individual is or is not sovereign over his own person, otherwise there could be no private property.
Look at it this way, if self-ownership is conditional, the individual's bodily autonomy is subject to being violated by other individuals and the state. This opens the door to human enslavement and trafficking. Put another way, if self-ownership is conditional, a tyrant has a right to enslave a nation's inhabitants or force them to participate in a communist economic system because the land he rules over is his own private property.
Without self-ownership, you cannot avoid being used and abused by others more powerful than you, hence its importance for libertarians.
So if you have a hard time breathing and cannot wear a mask due to that condition making it hard to breathe, it is your position that you are out of luck it a private business forces you to leave?
Pretty much anything that doesn't grant the "private property" infinity power is "un-American" accordingly...
The private property has unlimited powers and frankly, it is out of sheer luck that the owners don't just randomly kill all the customers when they're not looking. Just say they were trespassing and it's fine....
/S
AngryNordYes.jpg
Are you a liberal or something? Your personal thoughts, feeling, and comfort mean absolutely nothing in the face of my right to dictate every rule and regulation in my property.
You're arguing it's your right to dictate another person's natural biological processes simply because he's on your property. That is absurd.
Is my heart beating too fast on your property? Do you have the right to mandate heart regulation medication because it's not in a range of your liking?
You have rights to dictate rules pertaining to your property, you do not have the right to govern how a person's body operates.
Brilliant. Top kek
Just getting people to reveal their true intentions.
If a private business requires that you pledge allegiance to Islam and denounce any faith you might currently hold in order to eat at their food counter, you’re ok with this because it’s private property?
Note the above is currently illegal under the civil rights act.
It seems your position is that corporations otherwise open to the public for business are able to discriminate against potential customers on any grounds for any reason. Are you a liberal?
Yes, I just wouldn't eat there, because I'm not self entitled like you. Now, if we're talking about discrimination by government entities, that's a different discussion, but the right to discriminate is part of the first amendment right to association. You're the one acting like a liberal, as you want to carve out exceptions for things that you want. The problem with that mindset is that's exactly what leads to things like trannies in women's sports. If you can't discriminate against race or religion, then why not make discrimination against "gender" illegal? On the other hand, if discrimination was fundamentally legal, then there wouldn't be protected classes, and private entities, like private schools, could choose not to allow such things. Your position is much more destructive than you think.