Kaitlin posted a picture of herself cooking for her husband, and Dems weren't too happy about it.
(www.youtube.com)
🌶️🌶️ SPICY🌶️🌶️
Comments (96)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
More women need to rebel against leftists by cooking for men. In fact just be a full blown housewife out of total rebellion. The new counter-culture is being a housewife, do it.
i always knew my wife was counter culture
If a woman wants to work, I think that's fine, but we need to be honest as a society about the crippling costs of dual income households on children. If both parents are working demanding jobs, what kind of life does that leave for the kids? Eating takeout or frozen food multiple times a week? Being raised by paid strangers and YouTube?
We should really be encouraging families to have one stay at home parent, whether its the husband or the wife. If that was the norm again, it would solve many problems at once. Having a kid is now more affordable because you don't have to pay someone to watch your child all the time. Your kid will grow up in a more loving and supportive home and is less likely to suffer from disorders and behavioral issues later in life. Income inequality would go down because most dual income families are in the lower to middle class and removing roughly half the supply of labor would result in much higher wages for these groups. With more people at home, cooking almost every meal becomes easier, which will lead to reduced obesity, lower diabetes levels, lower levels of heart disease, and probably a host of other health-related benefits from people not eating processed shit all the time.
Another related benefit is it would likely lower the divorce rate. People will think more carefully before they marry someone if they know this person is going to be their economic support or the person who runs the day to day affairs of the family. When you're a dual income family its easy to split up if you're not happy. You have your own income and manage the day to day in your own life. If you're a true team as a couple that becomes much harder and so it provides incentive to choose wisely in the first place, and to exhaust all options for working out problems if they do arise.
What we also need to be honest about is WHY do women want to work?
I know very few people who truly want to work. It's not really a thing people want to do. People grow into it and accept it as their responsibility and having money is nice but at the end of the day, most people would prefer not working if they could.
People who try to rationalize working as "I'm helping others" or "contributing to society" etc... are just running mental gymnastics to justify working when they don't truly want to. There are some people that do truly love what they do but it's more like 1% of people who have this job not 99%. Most of the time people saying they love their job are using a psychological self-defense mechanism to try and make themselves feel better about working.
Why do women work? That is the question we need to ask ourselves. Women who work for independence, for materialism or because society told them they were supposed to and they just followed along are all working for the wrong reasons. The only truly good reason to work is to put food on one's table and contribute to a community but most people's work isn't contributing to their own community. With globalization, most people's work is actually hurting their own communities, though few understand it.
We need to start changing our culture and promoting women to stay home to look after the family instead of working. This is better for her, better for the men in society and better for children.
I highly disagree with you trying to play the quality role. The man should work and the woman should stay home. That leads to a much better outcome for society as a whole. Women are better designed to be the homemakers and men better designed to be the workers. That is the way it should be.
I think there are certainly jobs men are better suited for, but there are also jobs that women are best suited for. If a woman wants to work, I think that's fine. Maybe women are optimal caretakers and men are optimal worker bees, but that doesn't mean everyone needs to do that. A man can raise children and keep a home perfectly well and a woman can work perfectly well.
I think the thing that can't be accommodated is children raised by screens and strangers because both parents are working outside the home.
Honestly, I kind of don't want to work...
Honestly, I hated being the kid who never had allowance money back when I was younger. Am I being materialistic? I guess so. But I also don't buy a lot of clothes or other such things.
I did try the housewife thing for a bit before I had my kid and was bored out of my skull. Now, I could probably make it work. But I'd have to have some "me" money, and that just feels like an extra annoyance to put on the husband. (It certainly was back then.)
These days I work full time and take care of the kid and housework. Yeah, it's a lot of work. But it is what it is. And both of our savings are starting to build up.
I don't disagree with the situation you found yourself in and have made work. I'm just saying what is optimal. If less women were involved in work, men's salaries on average would go up. Most people are exceptionally wealthy and do need far less than they realize. If public education was abolished and many welfare programs we don't need then after-tax income would go up again. Most guys would prefer the wife staying home in my experience so it's not a burden at all. It's only a burden when men have to worry about their wife leaving them, which is also the concern women have with giving up their career. That's a social program we need to look into fixing which has a lot of other underlying issues but ultimately, things do work better IMO when the man works and the woman stays home.
The only people truly benefiting from both men and women working are the owners of capital who've increased their workforce supply and thus their profit by lowering wages and increasing production. Production for things we don't truly need. If someone actually did the math on Starbucks coffees, secondary transport expenses, work clothes, etc... eating out because (too tired after long day of work), daycare, etc... etc... etc... Most people aren't actually adding much value at all by working and would actually be way better off just staying at home. While some women have significantly good careers, again when you factor in the fact that more of those careers would be available for their husbands if the women stopped working, combined with the education costs and everything else, it just really isn't worth it for most women to work.
I totally get why women end up working in modern society but we could create a better outcome for society, especially from a social and well-being not necessarily maximizing GDP, by having women not work.
I already did.
Bitch better know how to make good grits or she getting kicked out