Didn't you know that the constitution is language-fluid? Why bother changing the constitution when you can change definitions of words instead?
(Insert Tapping head meme here)
Yep, the only legal document I I know of that is that way. Oh, and the Civil Rights Act that somehow applies to gender identity even though it says “sex” (thanks, Gorsuch).
Oddly, I can’t change the meaning of my long term lease or long term purchasing contracts. Weird.
Just a quick reminder that the founders knew these idiots would try to pull shit like this and gave us the Ninth Amendment to prevent it.
This should be challenged at every level, in every state, in every case, regardless of precedent.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
In other words, you have to prove that we specifically don't have a right to do something in order to prevent us from doing it. Saying that the Constitution doesn't guarantee it specifically isn't good enough, because it does specifically guarantee it, it just doesn't name it.
And now they investigate you as an extremist if you join a militia. So you have no right to a gun unless you are in a well regulated militia, but if you join a militia, we will harass you and threaten your liberty. Gotta love liberal logic!!!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
vs
Because all firearms are evil and no human being should be allowed to even cast their eye upon one, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Weird, the limitation on government in both of of those examples is completely unchanged.
For the glowsticks reading this, fuck off an apologize for Ruby Ridge you fucking baby killers.
It isn't that they misunderstand it. They don't like it. And increasingly so, law isn't what the law actually says. It is what they decide and they prosecute or ignore what they want.
They want the patriotic whites to rise up so they can eliminate us in one fell swoop. The beta cucks will remain in order to show the low IQ’s how to run things
people are too afraid and don't yet feel taking that big first step is justified yet. If they come for the guns, that will change for millions of people
As of right now it's totally legal. You don't even need all that cloak and dagger. You just 3d print a gun and take it to the range and show the cops on the way.
The ruling basically said that the states in question have the right to limit open carry laws if they choose to. So the 9th circuit basically said yes, they do get to have something to say about it.
Well that's an inflammatory statement. The actual statement is that they're holding up state's rights to limit right to carry by their own laws:
State governments have the right to limit the right of individuals to carry guns in public, requiring them to show urgency or need and be of "high moral character," the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found on Wednesday, dismissing an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law.
"The en banc court affirmed the district court's dismissal of an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law, Hawaii Revised Statutes � 134-9(a), which requires that residents seeking a license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate the urgency or the need to carry a firearm, must be of good moral character and must be 'engaged in the protection of life and property,'" the court said.
EDIT: It also took me less than 1 minute to research this. People really need to stop taking tweets, from anyone but especially someone as politically motivated as the NRA, at face value.
The Ninth circuit cannot create law only interpret it. Each State has it's own laws that stood then test of time under the scrutiny of the U.S. Constitution. They need to go back to their local Starbucks and figure out why that can't catch fish.
Should probably read the case before you say that..... all they are saying is the states do in fact have a say so in the gun carry laws inside of their own borders
This is just as dangerous. The state has no right, this is a right recognized by the constitution, not a right given. The only, "say so" they should have is, "Yes, sir!"
So that “and bear” language means nothing, eh?
The Constitution means nothing to these Commies.
Ummmm where are all these judges Trump got in service?
The reason he got so many through is they were all RINO approved Communists.
Exactly those were Mitch’s judges not Trump’s.
Didn't you know that the constitution is language-fluid? Why bother changing the constitution when you can change definitions of words instead? (Insert Tapping head meme here)
Yep, the only legal document I I know of that is that way. Oh, and the Civil Rights Act that somehow applies to gender identity even though it says “sex” (thanks, Gorsuch).
Oddly, I can’t change the meaning of my long term lease or long term purchasing contracts. Weird.
"Keep means in a vault in the state armory, and bear means the cost of funding all the permits to be allowed to keep." -Kavanaugh
Just a quick reminder that the founders knew these idiots would try to pull shit like this and gave us the Ninth Amendment to prevent it.
This should be challenged at every level, in every state, in every case, regardless of precedent.
In other words, you have to prove that we specifically don't have a right to do something in order to prevent us from doing it. Saying that the Constitution doesn't guarantee it specifically isn't good enough, because it does specifically guarantee it, it just doesn't name it.
MOOOOOT!!
How can something so fucking simple be so misconstrued?
They always bring up the Militia Part, but fail to realize WE ARE THE MILITIA
And now they investigate you as an extremist if you join a militia. So you have no right to a gun unless you are in a well regulated militia, but if you join a militia, we will harass you and threaten your liberty. Gotta love liberal logic!!!
Let's compare:
vs
Weird, the limitation on government in both of of those examples is completely unchanged.
For the glowsticks reading this, fuck off an apologize for Ruby Ridge you fucking baby killers.
You forgot WACO
One step at a time.
I shall piss on Lon Hourichi's grave though.
It says the people.
Oh, people? To bad we're only sub human slaves now
It isn't that they misunderstand it. They don't like it. And increasingly so, law isn't what the law actually says. It is what they decide and they prosecute or ignore what they want.
Free men don't ask.
Nailed it. And if you're not free, you know you need someone's permission.
WTF this goes directly against a supreme court decision. Illinois was FORCED to develop a CCW law or have it imposed on them.
They really want the whites to rise up don't they? Well, come for the guns. That's about the most obvious red line I know for almost anyone.
They want the patriotic whites to rise up so they can eliminate us in one fell swoop. The beta cucks will remain in order to show the low IQ’s how to run things
people are too afraid and don't yet feel taking that big first step is justified yet. If they come for the guns, that will change for millions of people
As of right now it's totally legal. You don't even need all that cloak and dagger. You just 3d print a gun and take it to the range and show the cops on the way.
Nothing illegal about that, yet
They're working very hard to change that though
Forgive me if I skip the "show the cops on the way" step. Regardless of how legal it is I don't like to put myself on their radar.
Uh. The Government doesn't have to know everything...
Yes, and already exists.
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Yea, we'll see if AK, AZ and MT have anything to say about this..
The ruling basically said that the states in question have the right to limit open carry laws if they choose to. So the 9th circuit basically said yes, they do get to have something to say about it.
The bible, clearly states that Judges determine the righteousness of a nation.
And wicked ones will destroy a nation.
Well that's an inflammatory statement. The actual statement is that they're holding up state's rights to limit right to carry by their own laws:
EDIT: It also took me less than 1 minute to research this. People really need to stop taking tweets, from anyone but especially someone as politically motivated as the NRA, at face value.
Color me shocked that the NRA hypes for donations.
And folks: Yes, they are going to try to take your guns. Yes, the Courts have been infiltrated by commie faggots. The NRA is ineffective.
Save your money to buy ammo and keep living.
Except states don't have the authority to restrict constitutional rights, and a court saying they do is illegitimate and unconstitutional itself
Once they blatantly rule against the Constitution, they are traitors and should be treated as such. Their rulings are to be ignored.
NRA.....HAHAHA!!! Compromise monkeys is all they are.
ahem
Shall not be infringed.
This is an attempt to destroy the 2nd amendment by making it illegal to have your gun anywhere but your home.
Good luck when the next governor of Arizona is a Dem for the first time ever and they try to implement gun laws here.
the 9th circus must be abolished for anti constitutional conspiracy
...shall not be infringed."
"We'll see about THAT."
OOH! The NRA is going to get involved? I can feel the judge trembling all the way to my house.
Rectify what? Just fucking ignore it. It works.
We need thousands of gun owners to march openly and oit a stop to this by PEACEFULLY PROTESTING and refusing to give up our guns or our gun rights.
No this pretty much only affects CA and HI. Pretty sure everywhere else is an open carry state.
Where our Hawaiian judge equivalent?!
Ridiculous
Time to stretch our second amendment rights , directly in the faces of all those involved.
The Ninth circuit cannot create law only interpret it. Each State has it's own laws that stood then test of time under the scrutiny of the U.S. Constitution. They need to go back to their local Starbucks and figure out why that can't catch fish.
no open or concealed carry in AK. LOL! that will never fly there, ever. Even the liberals there carry.
I can understand all of those except Montana like how the hell did that happen for Montana
Holy fuck! I thought we were turning a corner when they put an injunction on the "high capacity" magazine ban.
This shit cannot continue to stand. They’re stripping our God given Rights in broad daylight...
Should probably read the case before you say that..... all they are saying is the states do in fact have a say so in the gun carry laws inside of their own borders
This is just as dangerous. The state has no right, this is a right recognized by the constitution, not a right given. The only, "say so" they should have is, "Yes, sir!"
Thanks. Does your constitutional knowledge feel arcane/useless? I am wondering why I bothered learning it. It does not seem to matter.