Didn't you know that the constitution is language-fluid? Why bother changing the constitution when you can change definitions of words instead?
(Insert Tapping head meme here)
Yep, the only legal document I I know of that is that way. Oh, and the Civil Rights Act that somehow applies to gender identity even though it says “sex” (thanks, Gorsuch).
Oddly, I can’t change the meaning of my long term lease or long term purchasing contracts. Weird.
Just a quick reminder that the founders knew these idiots would try to pull shit like this and gave us the Ninth Amendment to prevent it.
This should be challenged at every level, in every state, in every case, regardless of precedent.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
In other words, you have to prove that we specifically don't have a right to do something in order to prevent us from doing it. Saying that the Constitution doesn't guarantee it specifically isn't good enough, because it does specifically guarantee it, it just doesn't name it.
So that “and bear” language means nothing, eh?
The Constitution means nothing to these Commies.
Ummmm where are all these judges Trump got in service?
The reason he got so many through is they were all RINO approved Communists.
Exactly those were Mitch’s judges not Trump’s.
Didn't you know that the constitution is language-fluid? Why bother changing the constitution when you can change definitions of words instead? (Insert Tapping head meme here)
Yep, the only legal document I I know of that is that way. Oh, and the Civil Rights Act that somehow applies to gender identity even though it says “sex” (thanks, Gorsuch).
Oddly, I can’t change the meaning of my long term lease or long term purchasing contracts. Weird.
"Keep means in a vault in the state armory, and bear means the cost of funding all the permits to be allowed to keep." -Kavanaugh
Just a quick reminder that the founders knew these idiots would try to pull shit like this and gave us the Ninth Amendment to prevent it.
This should be challenged at every level, in every state, in every case, regardless of precedent.
In other words, you have to prove that we specifically don't have a right to do something in order to prevent us from doing it. Saying that the Constitution doesn't guarantee it specifically isn't good enough, because it does specifically guarantee it, it just doesn't name it.
MOOOOOT!!