Please provide source material - dont just post a link.This will most likely be appealed - which means the original 9th decision in 2016 may be overturned. thats a good thing.
And Summary:
The en banc court noted that this Court has previously
held that individuals do not have a Second Amendment right
to carry concealed weapons in public. Peruta v. County of
San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). The
question presented in this case, accordingly, was limited to
whether individuals have a right to carry weapons openly in
public.
Please provide source material - dont just post a link.This will most likely be appealed - which means the original 9th decision in 2016 may be overturned. thats a good thing.
Heres the case:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/03/24/12-17808.pdf
And Summary: The en banc court noted that this Court has previously held that individuals do not have a Second Amendment right to carry concealed weapons in public. Peruta v. County of San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). The question presented in this case, accordingly, was limited to whether individuals have a right to carry weapons openly in public.
Do you know why the 2016 case wasn't appealed?
Appeals cost money, but I believe San Diego had changed their policy by the time the en bank decision was made, so it was moot.
Don't worry. They change just in time to render it moot again too. The Supreme Court is worthless trash.