19
Comments (13)
sorted by:
2
Archdukeofevil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't bear an arm if you cannot carry it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
EatMyBallsAmerican [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously. Fucken faggots

1
marishiten 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is about open carry.

But I'm confused why only these states are targeted. If they're saying the right to open carry is "Illegal", then why isn't it affecting all states like Idaho and Texas? Both of those states are "Open Carry" "Constitutional Carry" "Right To Carry" states.

And why can't those specific states just make state law saying they can open carry. We know CA, OR, WA, and HI won't, but guns are kind of NEEDED in AK and MT. What if you want to hunt? Are you just not allowed to carry a rifle even if you have a deer tag? Like what the fuck is this?

2
EatMyBallsAmerican [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It about open and conceal

1
marishiten 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess the case got denied by the 9th circuit because they said "Look, it's for the states to decide if you can constitutional carry". So the Federal Government is deferring to the states to enact their own policies for it.

Which I think is bullshit, but it's not as bad as people are saying it is.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Tripin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is "the right to have and bear arms" not completely clear and straight forward?

1
EatMyBallsAmerican [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberal’s never learned the English language.

1
EatMyBallsAmerican [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fullblown purge has started

1
TheTrumpDimension 1 point ago +1 / -0

courts decide rights Nah bro i'll interpret a plain as fuck statement myself and act accordingly

2
EatMyBallsAmerican [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dam straight fren