99
Comments (17)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
JimQPublic 14 points ago +14 / -0

I don't understand how someone can read the second, which quite literally says, "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," and think it means that there is no right to carry.

That's what bear means, you fucking morons.

7
Friendly_B 7 points ago +7 / -0

They haven't read it.

5
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Their truth tells them the constitution is a living document.

4
Friendly_B 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's how they've been able to curtail so many rights of Americans, by making it as flexible as they are.

3
OccasionalCortex21 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. They can just redefine every word in that sentence so it somehow means the opposite.

0
JohnCocktoastin 0 points ago +2 / -2

I mean...technically they are kinda right. You have a right to wear a tank top and show off those guns, but there is no right to lift anything with those guns. Founders should have been more specific when protecting guns in the second amendment to include the right to lift things with them. I didn't work hard on my guns for years just to show them off! They do have a use besides admiration you know...