88
Comments (10)
sorted by:
7
Drewdrewdrew2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fuck Reddit

6
Jon888 6 points ago +6 / -0

How does reddit not understand the streisand effect?

6
South_Florida_Guy 6 points ago +7 / -1

It's a dude.

6
Spez-Covfefe 6 points ago +6 / -0

"him"

5
ikth 5 points ago +5 / -0

"We did not adequately vet her background before formally hiring her"

Reads as we didn't know.

"On March 9th, we added extra protections for this employee"

Reads as we totally knew.

Get your story together. If you didn't know what they were accused of supporting, then why were you defending them? Surely you knew that defending them was the same as taking a stance even if didn't know what you were defending them from and that's just grossly incompetent at best.

0
contribulation 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's not unreasonable for a company to protect an employee from harassment until an investigation concludes.

1
ikth 1 point ago +1 / -0

An investigation of what? Everything they did already happened and any investigations that were started were already over. The political party they were a part of already investigated and kicked them out years ago.

A statement disavowing their previous stance and showing a change has occurred would help, but instead, they and their employer, Reddit, are just burying the situation.

2
ChairmanMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

His

2
runonce 2 points ago +2 / -0

"we did not adequately vet" my fucking ass. A google search of her name gives pages of criminal and shady pedophile activities perpetrated by her whole family. They wanted a pedophile and they hired a pedophile.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0