You have been subjected to liberal propaganda. I feel sorry for you

probably can't change your mind, because you seem to not like to think too hard, but that whole thing is taken way out of context.

Deport

Powell writes as a lawyer, who's opinions will go before a Yes/No court. The legacy media smeared those statements, likely because they didn't understand them and hoped you didn't understand them either.

I dunno if this helps but if you read the article they're making clear that her statements were those of an opinion not of fact. She cannot be sued over a statement of opinion, she's making sure to clarify that she was not making statements of fact

Yesterday, several news media outlets cut and paste out of context portions of our motion to dismiss the Dominion complaint to “spin” a message that the election fraud allegations that Ms. Powell presented to various courts and to the public were not credible. I’d like to clarify what actually was presented to the court. First, let me be clear: any suggestion that “no reasonable person” would believe Ms. Powell or her comments on the election is false. The language these reports referred to is a legal standard adopted by the courts to determine whether statements qualify as opinions which are exempt from defamation liability.

As the DC Circuit reaffirmed just last week, there is no claim for defamation when the alleged “defamatory” statement is a legal opinion. Ms. Powell’s statements fall precisely into this category. Ms. Powell reviewed sworn affidavits, declarations, expert testimony, and other highly corroborated evidence concerning the election which Ms. Powell filed with the courts and shared publicly. She continues to stand by those opinions today. Our motion, in part, argues that the Dominion case should be dismissed because legal opinions are not grounds for defamation.