50
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you feeling ok? I read the whole thing and actually saw most of the videos prior. The reported numbers by doctors in the US, to use your concept, was .003% of the number vaccinated, died. ( just a third of your .01)

The cdc decided it was akshually 0 deaths after “reviewing” the cases and blaming the deaths on their medical history And not the vaccine. I’m simply pointing out that there is no way there are 0 deaths, especially since they don’t discredit the claim that thousands have been hospitalized after taking the plunge.

As for this particular claim, it’s impossible to tell if these numbers are legit, but I’m not even referencing them.

1
UnidentifiedPa3 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm great, yeah. I'll admit, I was taking a stab in the dark with the .01%, it was just to illustrate a point.

So, it's okay to blame COVID deaths on medical history, but when it comes to vaccinations, medical history and other diseases are off the table. Sounds like hypocrisy to me.

People get hospitalized and die all the time. This was my argument for the over-inflated COVID deaths. The problem is proving causation; implying the cause of their hospitalization is the vaccine is just a guess by you and others, not backed by any evidence.

The article lists what conditions the patients had when they died, or what they contracted after getting vaccinated. You'd be hard pressed to prove any of the related "reactions or deaths" were directly caused by the vaccination itself.

These are paranoid assumptions at best, at this point. That being said, I don't think people who aren't at risk should get the vaccine. It's experimental and authorized for emergency use.

1
Proud_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the same page for the hypocrisy over covid related deaths, but you must know there are some deaths related to this shot. You can’t give millions of shots, have thousands of doctors report a death and then magically wipe all their data away.

I also agree it’s irresponsible to push an unapproved drug upon the entire populace for a virus that has a 99.7% survival rate. If any long term effects sprout up in a negative way, we will have given everyone the problem.

1
UnidentifiedPa3 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really don't know that, and neither do you. Like I said, proving the shot was the direct cause of death isn't something that's easy to do and certainly isn't accomplished in a matter of months. People have millions of factors in their lives that influence their overall health.

We're on the same page when it comes to that. I'm only against pushing fear on vulnerable populations without corroborating evidence, because they could be the .3% that would die from COVID without the shot.

People have their theories as to what's going on, and that's fine. But pushing a theory as fact is just lunacy in my opinion.

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many deaths within hours would it take before you accept at least some are directly related to the shot?

The allergy aspect alone is enough to suggest at least some have died. Heck, even the flu vaccine had to pay out on death claims.