67
Comments (22)
sorted by:
9
HuggableBear 9 points ago +9 / -0

As if Biden even has the first fucking clue what any of those words mean

6
CanadaDidPearlHarbor [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Most likely not. But his Wall Street backers sure do

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hollywood has been trying to stop bittorrent for decades and always failed. Cryptocurrency uses the same technology but even better because you don't need a centrally managed list of all nodes. Wall street can't do shit.

What they can do however is to sell fake Bitcoin certificates to fool people, just like they do with gold and there by keep the price down. Or buy a shitload of coins for themselves and then dump to make the price look more volatile than it is, which of course is a loss for them.

They don't have the same control over exchanges as they have over the stock market so anyone can play the same game on equal conditions and play out the wall street clowns with their own methods. And the more manipulation, the faster decentralized exchanges will grow, which is even harder for them to manipulate, plus that trading is anonymous and secure, even to FED coin, cash or gold.

6
Racerx719 6 points ago +6 / -0

Investors = Old democrat cronie fucks who don't like seeing young dudes buy lambos with crypto

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nailed it

3
funckydechunk 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’ll be impossible to enforce. The only people who’ll be affected are ppl whose crypto is on exchanges. Cold wallets would be impossible to find.

1
3
funckydechunk 3 points ago +3 / -0

They seized a hard drive with crypto on it.

Ask if they have access to it. They don’t.

-1
Anon331717 -1 points ago +1 / -2

They clearly did if they seized it. Seize actually means access. seize sēz► intransitive verb To grasp suddenly and forcibly; take or grab. intransitive verb To take by force; capture or conquer.

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Government can't break encryption, if they did get access to it they either tortured the owner or tricked him into believing that he wouldn't get a lifetime sentence with daily torture, if and only if he gave up his keys.

This is why you shouldn't tell random people how much crypto you hold, or that you hold at all.

0
2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The design of the system goes to great lengths to collect particular data that would be necessary for an attack on Diffie-Hellman but not for alternative explanations, like a break in AES or other symmetric crypto," the researchers wrote.

Weaker algorithms has for a long time been considered at risk, cryptocurrency has always used symmetric algorithms and are therefore NSA safe. Here's a good sheet on what NSA could possibly break and when: https://www.keylength.com/en/4/

1
Anon331717 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anything than can be built can be destroyed. There is absolutely nothing than is impenetrable. When you build something, you learn what it’s vulnerabilities are, so that those vulnerabilities can be mitigated. Even MIT will tell you that blockchain isn’t impenetrable-https://cams.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-06-WSJ-Blockchain-Is-Unbreakable_Think-Again.pdf

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
funckydechunk 1 point ago +1 / -0

didn’tNo they

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Under warrants, authorities seized more than 300 cryptocurrency accounts, four websites, four Facebook pages and millions of dollars.

Accounts are typically exchange accounts, nobody can crack a wallet. If you don't trust me this site proves that mathematically: https://privatekeys.pw/

2
smart_bitcoin 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 out of 2^256

2^256 = 23 commas

2
Tejanopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

“State enforced transgender Ian is coming in 2026. Here’s why that’s good for straight men”

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jokes on him, I keep my rigs upstairs.

0
christianknight 0 points ago +2 / -2

shut it down!