409
Comments (32)
sorted by:
19
pede8 19 points ago +19 / -0

Gun control is about controlling slaves of any race

15
MAGAsJustBegun 15 points ago +15 / -0

No we wouldn't. We believe open carry should be legal, obviously excluding using it to intimidate innocent people.

That Muslim who shot up the Kroger the other day planned to attack a Trump rally a year earlier. I can promise you had that happened, I wouldn't believe in further restricting lawful gun ownership across USA.

Bad people do bad things. Doesn't mean I'm gonna set myself up to be the next victim of a genocide, which has occured multiple times in nearly every country the past century or two.

10
Sick_of_the_bs [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

If everyone carried, there'd be no one to intimidate with a firearm. Everyone could defend themselves if threatened.

10
TraitorJoes 10 points ago +10 / -0

Like "300 heavily armed members of a group called No Fucking Around Coalition" marching for weeks and nobody did shit.

Oh.....

And they shot 4 of their own Blak Peepo?

8
Filo76 8 points ago +8 / -0

Leftie sees a BB Gun: "Is this an assault rifle?"

3
DonnieRamesJio 3 points ago +3 / -0

Purple haired grocery store checker flipped her shit once when I had a cheap kids' bow across my neck

8
giacomo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Like the black panther party did in CA?

2
sordfysh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly my thought.

Blacks carrying guns for protection from the government is the reason Democrats ban guns, and it's one of the reasons libertarians buy guns.

6
NullifyAndSecede 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's not totally wrong, just late, black folks open-carrying scary long arms was one of the big impetuses for infringing on our right to keep and bear military arms.

Even the NRA was on board with this.

https://mises.org/wire/racist-history-gun-control-1

5
Sick_of_the_bs [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I knew about the gun bans from the Black Panthers, but I didn't know about the 1790s regulations. Thanks for the link!

6
crazyjackel 6 points ago +6 / -0

My father once asked me a simple question:

Would I rather be in a room where everyone had guns, myself included, or one person had a gun.

Someone will always have a gun. It is better that I have one and they have one so we can keep each other in check.

If these people are so scared of white terrorists, they should go and get guns to defend themselves. I have more respect for the radical far left and jihadists in this regard than the sheep.

5
substantialmajestic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your terms are acceptable.

5
Pumpingiron_Patriot1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wasn't that dude handing out ARs from the trunk of his car at Chaz in Seattle.

I didn't see a ban

4
SteelWolf87 4 points ago +4 / -0

That concept bumps with the “if black people did that they’d be dead” one.

4
healthy2legs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its been about 70 years since the last time American infantry were sent into combat carrying guns that didn't have the option of automatic fire. Rifles that don't have the automatic fire option are not assault rifles.

4
RedditSucksChinaPoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well 'Alex Cole' problem is that most black people are felons and can not own guns.

2
XxXusernameXxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo

4
Monkeybeardontcare 4 points ago +4 / -0

i live in the south. sometimes in the only white but on the range. guess who's armed? gay men, fathers teaching there daughters how to shoot, veterans, parents, citizens. all peaceful

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Dialectic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Awkward truth is if all black people walked around with rifles they’d start murdering the shit out of each other. Statistically

1
BoffoTheClown 1 point ago +1 / -0

Start?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Wolfebane84 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah sure, keep playing dat victum card....

2
Smurfection 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does the idiot know that when the NRA started, many blacks joined because they feared the klan and needed to carry guns on their persons? In fact, Harriet Tubman carried a gun on her person her entire life.

2
DudeNoOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Full auto on demand without apology

2
DisplacedHipster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait.. Of course we would ban guns if they did this... yeah....

Psst...Everyone push this narrative, we'll have everybody armed in no time.

2
Dallasguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure why they keep saying that. Never heard any 2A advocate say anything of the sort. Want to end 90 percent of the violent crime in Chicago? Arm the law-abiding.

2
Alpha_Lemming 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bunches of blacks open carried last year in numbers.

The reaction was:

1] point and laugh at their ineptitude

2] wishing a MF would

3] applauding the 2A public exercise

2
woke-sheep 2 points ago +3 / -1

Narrator: They wouldn't, Alex

1
NoStepOnSnekPlz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Machine guns have been banned for a long time (fully automatic guns).

"Assault Rifle" is a new bullshit term that the leftists have made up that consist of various features applied to a semi-automatic firearm -- here is CA's fucking retarded definition in regards to rifles.

12276.1 (a) Notwithstanding Section 12276, "assault weapon" shall also mean any of the following: 1: A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:

  • A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon.
  • A thumbhole stock.
  • A folding or telescoping stock.
  • A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
  • A flash suppressor.
  • A forward pistol grip. 2: A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. 3: A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches.

I fucking hate these people....

2
Dallasguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assault weapon is a fabricated term. Assault rifle is a full-auto military rifle.

Since you seem to be interested in this topic, make sure you don't conflate those terms.