3067
Comments (172)
sorted by:
276
Polkadotard 276 points ago +277 / -1

Crazy world we live in, where pointing out the truth is considered savage.

195
deleted 195 points ago +195 / -0
94
deleted 94 points ago +95 / -1
64
deleted 64 points ago +71 / -7
32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
darkgwalchmei 4 points ago +4 / -0

This "Michael" is considered by Leftist Wikipedia to be a "Far-right" Conservative political commentator, author, activist and former radio host.

3
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Savage! 🤣

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
DeskRabbit_v2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fucking gottem

4
Revelation2010 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exhibit A.

1
DaughterOfLiberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am in love with James O’Keefe :)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
79
mixednuts86 79 points ago +79 / -0

In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

14
JimmyNelson 14 points ago +14 / -0

James O'Keefe is Based AF

4
Whoopies_tds 4 points ago +4 / -0

But but but CNN said....C'mon man, it's the thing according to sources (DNC), stop being a racist

46
HalfricanAmericanMan 46 points ago +47 / -1

I mean, the truth has always been savage. They killed Jesus for the truth and it was probably the same forces trying to kill us today.

14
Conservativechick 14 points ago +14 / -0

Boom. It's Satan, the Father of Lies. The atheists won't like it, but that's the fact.

8
Americomrade1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Atheist don’t care. Source: I am one. Evil is evil, call it whatever you need to.

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Satan was made by God, as God has made all creation. Why would atheists be mad? It's the Christians who should be mad about that. Dick move, really. World would be better without Satan, personal opinion, but I guess God knows better than I do, He must have some sort of plan for making Satan, and letting him run amok.

6
Congress_is_ISIS 6 points ago +6 / -0

Satan only lives in the heart of men who choose to allow him to enter

3
Kweebecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't address the comment, but good preachwork. Just remember not all evil looks evil, the most insidious of false prophets approach claiming to know the truth of Goodness. "The path to hell is paved in good intentions" does not mean that doing good leads to a negative outcome, it means those who would bring Hell upon us do so by claiming their bricks and mortar, their works, are more Goodly.

Satan was created by God, as one of His most powerful and fearsome creations. Neither Satan nor God are clowns, here to entertain us with our preconceived notions. Evil is cunning. Evil changes its methods. It does not tire of its vocation. It does not seek to be wiped out. If it never changed, it would have been wiped out millennia ago.

Do not assume Evil to be so simple, so childish, so... innocent and pure. The choices men make to allow evil to enter are not the tales of superheroes and unicorns. They are the tales of walking past a beggar. Of watching the cries of the downtrodden and shrugging in mock helplessness. Of looking at a dichotomy presented by the king of lies, and never conceiving of a third option.

You want an easy foe. You want a simple vanquish, to work without thought, without concern. You want to be morally and intellectually lazy. THAT is the work of the Lord of Lies. To assume evil to be innocent and childlike, obvious and easily vanquished, is his greatest accomplishment.

2
Congress_is_ISIS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I meant it in more of a way where man's choice aka free will is what gives light to Satan. God gave us that gift and man is the one who chooses to keep the flame of Satan burning.

1
Four_Potatos 1 point ago +1 / -0

God created freedom. Rebellion (Satan) is an inevitability if the freedom is real.

1
MehNahMehNah 1 point ago +1 / -0

No salvation without sin.

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

You ever wonder what would have happened if they didn't? Like, people have free will, what if they chose to believe in him and Jesus was like, "no, but I came here to die, someone has to crucify me." And they all just go "that sounds horrible, who would do that to God's own son?"

-20
MelAndDon4Ever -20 points ago +1 / -21

Well that was a savagely asinine comment.

17
HalfricanAmericanMan 17 points ago +18 / -1

Projection.

17
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 17 points ago +17 / -0

In a world of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

7
anon09 7 points ago +7 / -0

I pointed out the connection between clinton and tanzania near where that ship just got stuck, and everyone on twitter was immediately, "OK QTARD THAT'S A CONSPIRACY!! AND A DISTRACTION FROM US UNITING SEIZING THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION" like, ok... its true though, so you're dumb I guess.

120
HalfricanAmericanMan 120 points ago +120 / -0

The entire left can be summed up in two words: “no, you”. That is their entire platform against the right. Conservatives call you pedos, the Left says no you. We call out their corruption they left says no you. We call out their hatred the Left says no you. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION IS THE ONLY TOOL THE LEFT HAS WHEN ATTACKING THE RIGHT. CHANGE MY FUCKING MIND.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
15
Dereliction 15 points ago +15 / -0

He's been very right on SJWs.

1
HiddenDekuScrub 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty much this.

19
Grunt422 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yes, it's transference. The liberals weapon of choice. It's all they have to fall back on. A childish retort much like Pee Wee Herman's classic defense of himself. " I know you are, but what am I ?". No real acceptance of dealing with problems, or their own responsibilities. Just a shifting of the blame to anyone, or anything else.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Modern liberalism is a fundamentally adolescent belief system, so it's no surprise that they would use immature, childish argument tactics.

Why would we expect any different, from a group of people who don't even hide their desire to stay in school as long as possible, doing drugs and being a general drain on society? They don't want to grow up, and between helicopter parents and nanny state schools, they've realized they don't have to.

Still get to vote like an adult, though.

9
kekbepraised 9 points ago +9 / -0

alinski wrote a book about that....

4
Goldstein2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

And hardly anyone on the right has read it.

4
ObongoForPrison2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

We don't just "call them out," we bring the fucking receipts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
70
VinCarver 70 points ago +71 / -1

And that brain dead reporter just nods his head because he was only trained to parrot the packaged lies.

Can’t even have conversations anymore because everyone is trained to spit what they memorized from some junk propaganda pusher and shut down when new information comes at them.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
6
MisterGuapo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know if they teach it, but it's a way to get somebody to continue talking. You let them talk and keep talking with the hopes that you will get them to say something you can use against them.

2
sordfysh 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know for a fact that they teach journalism majors to report facts to fit their narrative.

They are specifically taught to report in service to a specific public goal. Combine that with relative morality and you get trained liars.

19
KoofasaForTrump 19 points ago +19 / -0

I think journalists are incredibly lazy these days too. This dimwit didn’t even try to find a conspiracy that O’Keefe was peddling so his interview would last more than 30 seconds.

4
MisterGuapo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. Reporters used to look for evidence for the stuff about which they were reporting. Now this guy was just parroting what he heard elsewhere to O'Keefe.

3
neurojerk 3 points ago +3 / -0

They just teach ideology at this point. I wasn't a journalism major, but my degree is closely related and I had to take a lot of the same classes. I was just there to learn how to work in the media industry, but half my classes were taken up watching videos by Jane Elliot and learning terms like "differently abled" instead of disabled. It's a complete joke. It's no wonder it's turning out people like this.

2
Kweebecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Differently abled" is one of the most BS terms I've ever heard.

Differently than what? And what about it is different? Define your terms!

17
BigBadBrutus 17 points ago +17 / -0

I wanted to punch the journalist in the face.

HOW is it possible that he's not reacting when James calls him out; not clicking that he is in fact a liar, that he' on camera being caught actively trying to smear James O'Keefe?

This journalist is one of two things: Evil beyond belief (knowing what his smears will lead to) Dumb beyond belief

I REFUSE to believe anyone is that dumb. Nobody is that dumb so that leaves malicious and evil.

But he doesn't even look evil. How do you act the part without being just dumb, and without looking the part?

2
Olds77 2 points ago +6 / -4

You can't see half his face and he may legitimately realize he has no room to argue. If he's been told countless lies about James and thinks it will be a slam dunk and then realizes like "oh, hey, maybe I don't know shit and this guy has a point" that might be a fitting reaction.

2
NavySTG 2 points ago +2 / -0

People like that reporter need to simply have their brains ventilated at 3200fps.

2
IlhanOmarsFagBrother 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's probably just some fucking journalism student that was sent to interview James by his masters, he probably doesn't even know what James does but he does anything his employer asks him to do. He just stood there and took it like a bitch. LULZ

36
Trilby 36 points ago +36 / -0

A sign of mental illness...

Yup. But the mask-guy doesn't seem phased by this beat down.

23
dizzle_izzle 23 points ago +23 / -0

That's the thing. These fucking zombies are only programmed for certain scenarios.

The term NPC is absolutely perfect. They don't know how to respond when given something that doesn't fit within their programming. They just nod

3
Dereliction 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's nodding, thinking, "Umm-hmm, this is exactly what a conspiracy theorist would say to that question."

4
Jutts 4 points ago +4 / -0

I love how he slipped that in there. I’m using that tactic.

3
VonBustacap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cognitive dissidence.

1
559throw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like you quoted, "a sign of mental illness."

27
Coslin 27 points ago +27 / -0

In other words - O'Keefe has recorded sources. Mainstream Media runs with Anonymous Sources. Look at the hot water that's gotten the Washington Post into last week.

11
Grond999 11 points ago +11 / -0

The WaPo has played it's part in dismantling America and creating AMarxica. The "hot water" is nothing to them.

20
KoofasaForTrump 20 points ago +20 / -0

O’Keefe is getting better and better at what he does. He still hasn’t lost a case in court and he has a lovely wall of shame where he posts all of the retractions other media has had to do because they are always wrong.

7
RiverFenix 7 points ago +7 / -0

RETRACTO.....

HES COMIN' AT YA!

4
maga_mama_757 4 points ago +4 / -0

I love that catchy Retracto tune, I find myself belting it out randomly. My kid thinks I'm a little nuts.

Retracto.....correction alpaca....

2
logan34 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love the man I pray he sleeps at night with a gun and keeps and eye open for Clintons and Soros assassination attempts. He’s a true Patriot that the Founding Fathers would be proud of.

20
okawesomeyeah 20 points ago +20 / -0

Thing is, O'Keefe is practicing textbook journalism as it used to exist as an objective process. Note that he said he only reports what people say and do. This is key because everything he reports is based in demonstrable truth. This drives the narrative-driven media nuts because he is unassailable on the core reporting. So what they do, is what they always do: attempt to destroy credibility by attacking the person instead of the presented subject. Which is why the focus is always on the methods and not what actually transpired, in hopes that your average low-information individual will hear the name O'Keefe or Project Veritas and think that he/it is some kind of propaganda machine. And unfortunately, it works, because the vast majority of people can't be bothered to see out actual truth and facts.

I find great irony in that one of the few people out there practicing actual objective journalism is public enemy #1 to the media as a whole. And they can't touch or discredit his work because it is based on the truth.

10
logic1010 10 points ago +10 / -0

Exactly, I sent a friend a video of his and immediately he responded with "he's a debunked conspiracy theorist". I asked him why he thought that. "because cnn told me that". Have you even once looked at his work? "Nope"

So mad!

3
Swolehas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deeeee BOOOOOOOOOOOOOONKED

6
PraiseBeToScience 6 points ago +6 / -0

Literally every time the left says anything about O'Keefe they always have to put "Controversial Youtuber, known for deceptively editing videos...".

Literally the only thing he ever did that raised 'controversy' was his ACORN story like twelve fucking years ago, when a Fox reporter told his audience that "this is how he was dressed for these interviews" and he came out in his silly over-the-top pimp outfit.

17
grandfather_nurgle 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's like when Elizabeth Warren accuses other people of racism when she has benefited from being a racist her entire life.

10
Chongald_Xrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

“Projection is one of the commonest psychic phenomena…Everything that is unconscious in ourselves we discover in our neighbour, and we treat him accordingly.”

(Carl Jung, Archaic Man)

9
MarginofFraud 9 points ago +9 / -0

James O'Keefe is one of the last few honest journalists left. This eurotrash reporter asking that bullshit question looks like a deer in headlights. He didn't realize he opened up a can of verbal whoop ass right in his own face.

8
KlunniClowns 8 points ago +8 / -0

He said it perfectly, and we'd do well to remember,

"Projection is a sign of mental illness"

More and more people are inadvertently or on purpose fostering mental illness in an already very narcissistic environment.

Unless we're all willing to look in the mirror and see how we might be contributing, not enough will change. We have to be like James O'Keefe, push back with truth and stand firm!

8
_Sully_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

They also conflate an honest to god conspiracy with the now naughty phrase "conspiracy theory". There are conspiracies going on and just because you have a theory on a conspiracy theory doesn't mean it should be marred by the connotation that comes with the magic phrase "conspiracy theory", such as, crazy, unsupported speculation without merit. Conspiracies fuckin' exist and it's a conspiracy that MSM and Big Tech are pushing massive misinformation campaigns to muddy the waters so they can push their agenda and shut down opposition. It ain't a theory, they are doing it.

4
FreedomFromGovt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just because we theorize about it, doesn't mean the conspiracy itself isn't real.

3
_Sully_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

We know that, right? But it's about language control. "Conspiracy theory" as it is used by them doesn't mean a theory about a conspiracy. It is a thought terminating cliché.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately that isn't just something the left has done. The extremist conspiracy retards have done considerable damage in their wake.

I used to tolerate the conspiracy crowd but when I saw the enormous number of stupid lies they spread about Harrison Deal's car crash, I basically gave up any goodwill.

There's a difference between "Ruby Freeman ran ballots through the machine multiple times" conspiracy, and there's "HAARP controls the weather and Biden took revenge on Texas by making it really cold for a week!" conspiracy. Or even "The Pentagon was hit by a missile" conspiracy.

Notice how O'Keefe doesn't buy into all that fringe unintelligent stupidity.

2
_Sully_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but you are lumping them together for some reason. Muddy the waters and the truth is indistinguishable from the lie. Then inject lies on top of lies so you can squeeze out your own version of truth. You're seeing sides on this when it's all just noise. Just stop arguing for the truth in the frame that it has to be associated with the phrase "conspiracy theory."

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm lumping them together because there's not only currently no differentiation in terminology, but people on this site don't seem to care to make the distinction.

Every single psychotic wild-eyed conspiracy pushed by Boomers, housewives, and rednecks, who barely passed high school and would probably flunk out by the third round of any bar trivia game, is upvoted without question or pushback. You can make up fucking anything and as long as your conspiracy is exclusively critical of the LEFT, it's treated as absolute point of fact.

Until this place starts burning these stupid motherfuckers at the stake like they deserve, it's always going to be a problem.

1
_Sully_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally agree but I don't see them as my side or whatever. It's just another element of the noise. We aren't gonna get some method of discourse consensus here. All I'm trying to say is what guys like you and I should do and encourage others to do.

3
r_engine 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agree. It should be obvious that conspiracies exist everywhere. Anyone who cares about people recognizing that should stop using "conspiracy theory" as a pejorative.

0
NataliesFeet 0 points ago +2 / -2

The entire point of Q was to discredit us and lump election fraud with Q as another crazy conspiracy theory believed by Trump supporters.

4
_Sully_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's all just language control. They insist on using "conspiracy theory" because it shifts the argument away from the material aspects of a conspiracy and injects kneejerk doubt. Most people don't think critically. They think on rails that guide them to conclusions with the least resistance. Phrases like "conspiracy theory" put's them on the rail straight towards "this is what crazy people think".

“There is a thought that stops all thought, and that is the only thought that ought to be stopped.”

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
goodguy 4 points ago +4 / -0

that was perfect

4
mytummyhurts 4 points ago +4 / -0

The media trap is accepting their premise and assuming they're rational, honest people. They're not.

4
BaltimoreCrew 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone live with or been around someone who is bi-polar?

You could basically say media companies are emulating everything that is this disease - likely learned from the CIA. Throw in social media and you get the actionable projection side.

The combination cycle of irrational thoughts, high/low emotional roller coaster and then eventually projection is the bedrock of Bi-Polar disorder, which is exactly what the media has learned works.

Steps:

Throw an irrational message out that’s typically a false narrative for someone’s agenda.

Example: These kids coming over the border are escaping cartels and violence.

Create an emotional response.

Example: Video/Images of dirty kids in tattered clothing, some in ambulances and crying while border patrol loads them in police vehicles. Then show them clean and in classrooms smiling and having a good time.

Then project that belief on the public.

Example: Do an interview with someone and bash them for being against illegal immigration, then in the following segment explain why kids aged 16 need to be added to voter roles lol.

And now you’re a victim of bipolar media manipulation for watching it.

1
pepperonishoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I concur. Had a family member that suffered from that. As an adjunct to your point there is also Problem-Reaction-Solution (The Hegelian Dialectic).

4
MAG_n_KAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

everytime someone brings up PV to the left, they respond by saying, "oh you mean that far right propagandist that been sued multiple times for deceptively editing videos?"

what they dont know, or probably intentionally leave out, is that PV won all those lawsuits.

4
MrAnderson1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Confornted by SJW. Accused of XYZ. My reply - I don't care what you think. I don't care what you say. It means nothing to me.

poof. That was that.

O'Keefe is just saying what you ought to say when confronted with vague faggot accusations. Name the specific time I did that. Name one time when I did that.

It's not hard.

They live in a world of self-importance and vague hazy abstractions which have no real world referent. All you have to do is ask them to find the referent and listen to the silence.

3
kmillz 3 points ago +3 / -0

This dude just got ethered. He was so stunned he had no response to being told he has a mental illness LMAO

3
QuietSpark 3 points ago +3 / -0

TRUTH IS NOT A FUCKING CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU BRAIN DEAD AUTOMATON ZEALOTS.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
undercovermaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

God damn he really did destroy that guy

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need to give out like, Pepe Awards - and this guy needs to get one.

2
the-mighty-kc 2 points ago +2 / -0

The truth will make you angry, but acceptance of it will set you free.

2
TwelveMoreYears 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reporter: "I know I'm a clown Mr. O'Keefe, but the media pays me to be one."

2
Bigdeal 2 points ago +2 / -0

This, this is what we need and much much much more of it.

2
Handy499 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am liking O'Keefe better every day. I hope he stays safe

2
pray4peace4 2 points ago +2 / -0

BOOM! The fool doesn't even get that he's a fool.

2
leakmouth 2 points ago +2 / -0

O’Keefe calls him mentally ill. Moron keeps nodding

2
X-Nemesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The reporters response is evidence of what a colossal waste of time it is, to rip those who are brainwashed, with any truth at all. It goes in and comes right out the other side orifice.

This version of the global communist left are just that brainwashed. You are a Nazi, that's the end of any discussion to them.

2
patr17 2 points ago +2 / -0

*asswhole. Can I use that?

1
okawesomeyeah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not the original poster, but why not. In this context could mean not a half ass, but the full, unmitigated ass.

1
ExileOnRedditStreet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rationally and logically pointing out leftist projection

1
MMazeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need that full clip.

1
Hangemh1gh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bill Clinton is a rapist!

1
sketchy_at_best 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could write a thousand words about how awesome that was, but one will do just as well.

Wrekt.

1
kekbepraised 1 point ago +1 / -0

the reporter seemed to agree with him... must be australian.

1
GodDamnedEngineer 1 point ago +1 / -0

ITS A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS.

THE FOOL NODDED IN AGREEMENT.

1
Twitter 1 point ago +1 / -0

guy couldn't give a direct answer then kept trying to change up what he was trying to say, prime example of brainwashed citizen . make'em so shook that they dont dare question anything they ask.

1
chucked_into_a_van 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s no reason to pull your punches. These people need to be beaten over the head with the garbage they are trying to sell.

1
LinWoodDidntKillHims 1 point ago +1 / -0

James literally just told this guy he was brainwashed. And all he could say was ok

1
orange_dit 1 point ago +1 / -0

His boyfriend probably won't mind the extra asshole.

1
FrankWisner 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAXIMSM FAGGOT

1
Canuck4Trump2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now THT is how you do it !!! Once again James O'Keefe outstanding !

1
1Crabbyoldfucker 1 point ago +1 / -0

LISTEN HERE FORIEGN PRESS, WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH RETARDED PRESS REPORTERS OF OUR OWN, AND WE NOT NEED YOU IMPORTING YOUR RETARDED PRESS.

1
Moreclang1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reminds me of AB

1
Shakakka99 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's surprising how still that good stood there while O'Keefe stuck it up his ass.

1
ProudWhiteMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I've started doing to people who say "the world is x, person is y, etc" these people have no standing on their opinions they just say it because it's what they heard. Then they'll finally say the tv or the newspaper said that, then you can go down another layer and say why did they report it that way. Nothing is not bad to everyone it's always bad to some but democracies aren't for all. It's for the majority so there will always be winners and loser to any action, over representing the loser or winners always create a reporting bias and narrative. You can't eliminate loss just as you can't eliminate wins what you can do is manufacture why a certain win/loss was unfair or why a win/loss was right.

1
Kek_The_World 1 point ago +2 / -1

LOVE when he tells the guy it’s a sign of mental illness. LMAO

1
Truglow 1 point ago +1 / -0

The language of liberals.