Ok so of course you should never be censored.

I am going to offer both support for your statement and I am going to present a counter argument.

So in support perhaps if the punishment for killing or harming a Leo were more severe injuries resulting from clashes with Leos would negatively impact injury and death on both sides including the criminal element side. Arrests made with the cooperation of the subject are far less likely to have any injuries right?

However on the flip side you have a bunch of people that are brainwashed to believe that Leos just are beating people so that argument is going to fall on deaf ears. Add to that the really very real issue of Leos being used in some cases as nothing more than bodyguards to people that definitely are not loyal to the constitution. Such was the case in Oregon when police units dispersed a group of protestors that were trying to sit in on the budget meeting which they were entitled to attend.

In conclusion I cannot really agree with your statement until this whole mess is fixed and we know that Leos will not be used as corrupt agents of, well in this case the Democrats as they right now seem to be America's internal enemies.

I do agree that the **statement does not deserve a violation **as I have presented a couple of different arguments showing the subject is deserving of some civilized discussion. Add to that, the statement does not prescribe any sort of vigilante justice as the death penalty is a punishment within the law and therefore to be validated would have to be added into law when the conflicting arguments would presumably be settled and we would have the correct answer. ****