I’d be interested if an expert in voice analysis has compared the voice in the Antifa conference call with the voice in known video recordings where Coomer is presenting Dominion products. It seems to me that is what this case hinges on. Truth is a defense to any defamation claim.
If they are determined to be different people then you have public/private person issue to determine whether negligence or actual malice is required to prove defamation.
If they are the same person then Coomer is exposed and fooked.
I’d be interested if an expert in voice analysis has compared the voice in the Antifa conference call with the voice in known video recordings where Coomer is presenting Dominion products. It seems to me that is what this case hinges on. Truth is a defense to any defamation claim.
If they are determined to be different people then you have public/private person issue to determine whether negligence or actual malice is required to prove defamation.
If they are the same person then Coomer is exposed and fooked.