33
Comments (8)
sorted by:
7
South_Florida_Guy 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Aww, shit, here we go again!"

3
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crap. First one was bad enough, but number 2 is going to be worse.

6
Cdogger 6 points ago +6 / -0

Jokes on them, I use nyt to wipe. Its great, aside from the inkass

4
Dirk_Diggler 4 points ago +4 / -0

He added: “We might have to work with a combination of reducing the weight by removing containers, oil and water from the ship, tug boats and dredging of sand.”

I want my 50k consult fee!😡

(I am joking, from my post history.)

Seriously, at this point, they just need to be using water cannons, pumps, and jets to erode the ground it’s on (they have the means on hand for this), it will destroy the canal locally, but they can shore it later, at a huge cost, but it’s still cheaper than blocking the canal for the timeframes they are working on.

3
OnlyTrump20 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, I'm still as well-stocked as any cheap road-side motel since I had to order a case online when there was none to be found in a store.

3
becky21k1 3 points ago +3 / -0

No Ship?

2
BugsleyKAG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's give Kim Jong-un a Shot at clearing the canal.

2
Tryan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Use a democrat. They love it.