Sidney filed a motion to dismiss. This article has very little that is not misrepresented. First, she argues for a change of venue because the DC court is the wrong jurisdiction. Then: the elements of libel are 1 statement is false and 2 a reasonable person would readily believe it to be true. The dismissal argues that the statements are regarding the election, therefore protected political speech - also based on affidavits that are available on the internet for people to make up their own mind. The "reasonable person would not believe" came from Dominion's filing.
Sidney filed a motion to dismiss. This article has very little that is not misrepresented. First, she argues for a change of venue because the DC court is the wrong jurisdiction. Then: the elements of libel are 1 statement is false and 2 a reasonable person would readily believe it to be true. The dismissal argues that the statements are regarding the election, therefore protected political speech - also based on affidavits that are available on the internet for people to make up their own mind. The "reasonable person would not believe" came from Dominion's filing.