38
Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
crazyjackel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, read what it does, perfectly reasonable: prevents federal funding from going to states and agencies that ban books. While, there most certainly are books out there that I think kids shouldn't be reading, that would be my job as a parent to stop them.

1
milehighvoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are there states/agencies that have banned books? Seems like this would do nothing. I know there are schools that have removed books from their curriculum but that's not really the same thing as banning right?

1
crazyjackel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think it’s a giant problem, right now, but it could be a big issue in the future. I don’t think it addresses the dr. Seuss situation at all.

Btw, that situation was kind of stupid: like companies cancelling their own products leads into higher sales is not a precedent I want to set.