I definitely agree with you on this although I still think it should be a relevant question. Not an automatic disqualifier by any means but I do believe it should trigger a little more in depth review of the individual. I don't really see a perfect solution for this type of scenario though.
He was only 3.
Hopefully I wouldn't be judged on where I lived when I was 3.
I definitely agree with you on this although I still think it should be a relevant question. Not an automatic disqualifier by any means but I do believe it should trigger a little more in depth review of the individual. I don't really see a perfect solution for this type of scenario though.
The answer it what someone else said.
You can't prevent every bad guy from doing something bad and there aren't always signs who will be the next to flip out.
You could take everyone's rights away and people would still kill. Ban all guns and people will still kill.
Put someone in a maximum security prison and they will still find a way to kill.
We have a checked and balanced government system and politicians still found ways to be corrupt and deceitful.
What if we just made murder-free zones?
wow you're so smart, you should run for president!
He was already on the FBI watch list is the point of the post. He made threats toward white people and Christians and Americans online frequently.
nah he should've just been sent back home, along with everyone else.
but you might have a grudge against the people who bombed your grandparents...
Seems the USA and Israel do more bombing in Syria than Muslims do.