102
posted ago by KGB82 ago by KGB82 +102 / -0

The point is this: A threat indicates a line not to be crossed. It goes both ways, so when you make the threat you should be prepared.

This is what the 2nd was for. Most of us are afraid for the consequences.

Those who compromise hate this country as much as the left. When your opponent knows you hate violence and do pretty much anything to avoid it, they become a madness. When you refuse to even talk about what is "too far" or "no go," they become the sickness.

At what point is our self-restraint in the face of the consequences going to evolve for lack of remedy into the time when evil is called good and good evil? Maybe, we're there already.

Finally, ask yourselves, why does the parent know they are right in the face of an adamantly obstinate child?

Proverbs 13:24 - He who spares his rod hates his son, But he who loves him disciplines him promptly.

Ecclesiastes 8:11 - Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.

Comments (36)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
TheThreeSeashells 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm still on-board with secession since that will be much more attractive to many more people who aren't ready to pick up a gun or leave their families to fight a war. Unfortunately, since few people will even talk about it, that's probably the "no shit miracle" to which you referred.

9
KGB82 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, the miracle I have in mind, which would be a real miracle, would be a nationwide revival in Biblical Christianity.

I also believe seccession is losing, since the dems will obviously have a precedent for using the military to intervene and will necessarily use it.

The other option, a revolution, would include most of the military being on our side.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

You haven't thought about how secession will happen. There are some thoughtful discussions about it here on this site. You should check them out. The military will be a non-factor. Done right, the majority of the country will be ours.

Thinking enough of the military will ignore orders and simply jump ship to our side is a big risk. I think there would be some, but probably not enough.

2
BasedNtruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sorry, but if you don’t think the Federal Government would declare war against the breakaway states IMMEDIATELY then you’re out of your mind.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

With what army? They will have lost a ton of soldiers to the new country. Also, I'm not talking piecemeal here. It has to be done as a coalition.

Additionally, the people in this thread, including the OP, is talking about fighting a war anyway so why not try the peaceful route first? Then if they want to fight a war, then we'll be fighting them and beating them legally. They can't arrest anyone for shooting back at that point. Our new country will just say, "Do whatever you need to defend OUR country."

1
HurdyGurdyHer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which "biblical" would that be? Luther made a fad of deleting and ignoring what he didn't like. Then there are fanciful translations, misquotes and misattributions that reflect opinion vs. scripture.

2
KGB82 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And don't worry, nobody expects atheists to fight an anti-christ motivated battle and war, so this post wasn't for you.

1
KGB82 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

KJV

6
AlcoholicRetard 6 points ago +6 / -0

And what happens when the left inevitably infiltrates and destroys our half of the country again? Cut it in half again? Fuck secession, it’s just ceding ground to communism. They must be destroyed.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

With what? The majority of the country will join the secession and there will only be random blue islands remaining for the Left. Blue islands with no means of production since they had long been supported by revenue generated from red states/counties. They would be crushed under their own weight very quickly. You set up state-level electoral colleges to prevent blue cities from controlling state-level elections and NO mail-in voting for any reason. We leave and create a system that shuts out Commies from any type of power. We know what to plan against and put the proper laws in-place to stop it from happening again.

You think it's ceding ground. Nope. This would destroy them. The best part would be watching their blue islands destroy themselves.

2
AlcoholicRetard 2 points ago +3 / -1

It would be much more efficient to just destroy them directly ourselves.

1
TheThreeSeashells 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good luck finding enough people to join. We can't even get people on our side to take off the masks in the supermarket. You expect everyone to join a shooting war? If you're talking about man-power, a serious secession movement is the way to go. This way you get 55, 65, 75 year-olds to join the fight. Or the disabled. People who won't be able to take part in a shooting war or revolution even if they wanted to.