Just think, somewhere there’s a 2 year old girl who’s Mommy is a stripper,....
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Maybe we leave the kids out of the conversation. Fuck Hunter but I wouldn’t blame him for beating the hell out of you for posting this.
I had someone stalk me from Twitter over to FB shortly before the election. They brought my kids into their fucked up “cancel game”. That was the night I developed an internal resolve to fight the radical left, fight until every single drop of blood is drained from my body.
Let’s leave the kids out of it!
(I no longer have Facebook or twitter, don’t dogpile)
Relax, Francis
Are you high? You are missing the point entirely. We're not even INCLUDING the kid. We're not saying anything about the kid. We are talking about Hunter being a deadbeat dad.
If you think Hunter should beat the Hell out of one of us for THIS, dude, you have a lot of Reading for Comprehension courses to take.
Who here called the kid a whore? Retard? Fat? Slow? Ugly?
You're so busy with an agenda that you can't think straight.
You are debooooonked! MOOOOOT.
Hey bud, if we aren’t talking about children, I’m trying to understand why the post is titled:
“Just think, somewhere there’s a 2 year old girl who’s Mommy is a stripper....”
You’re arguing like a globalist Democrat. No “two year old girl” to see here.....
Not one for abstract thought, are you???
I'll take it for granted that you are missing the entire point, rather than being a shill. This time. It will be simple, but will require some thought, so, pay attention, as there won't be another.
What is the post saying about the girl?
There. You. Go. Reread the italicized sentence.
Now, I'll expand, just because you may be led more by your genitals (Your a woman, or you are low T, and use emotions rather than brains: i.e., you seized upon the daughter, rather than the issue.) than by your brain.
The term 'let's leave children out of it" has the connotations, in the world of disputative discourse, that 'including children' is insulting them, i.e., an ad hominem argument against the parent, via the daughter's weakness (mental, moral, physical, etc...)
As in
Case One: "Your daughter is a retard/whore/cripple, as she only scored 64 on her IQ test, so you'd be a terrible...", "Heeeeey! let's leave daughters out of it! We're talking about what kind of President I'd make!" OK, inherent in this argument is the daughter, and her, read HER STUPIDITY. See?? Daughter's weak, ergo, Dad is bad.
Now, go back and read the post.
Case Two: "Hey, you're a deadbeat and if you can't take care of your daughter, how can you take care of us as a President?" Dad is a POS, ergo, the daughter is forced to suffer.
Case One gratuitously highlights daughter' frailties . Case Two shows daughter's being a victim of Dad. No frailties in ughter. See? We have no picture of the daughter's looks, brains, morality. We can guess nothing about her, not even her race, or if she has pinhead disease, 1 or 3 legs. We can only see that Dad is a turd. The daughter? A victim.
You're on your own now! Aside from a book on Propositional Logic, it all depends on you at this point. (I'd also suggest reading Pudd'n Head Wilson, by Mark Twain. First chapter, specifically, but, I don't think that you'd catch the point. You'd probably read the word 'slave' and have a breakdown.) YOU will have to figure it all out.
Finis
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA bruh, imma need a tl;dr because there is no way I’m reading your long ass 5 billion word, essay on earthworm gender studies or whatever the fuck you possibly wrote about.
Are you one of those intellectual antifa fags?