SCOTUS ruled that "all punishments which by their excessive length or severity are greatly disproportionate to the offenses charged.” in a proportionality ruling, where as the inverse can be applied as all punishments which by their severity are greatly proportionate to the offenses.
Mohammad Anwar, the man laying dead on the pavement, wasn't afforded any such luxury of limits to the depravity and violence done to him and Justice demands that the severity of punishment be suitable in character to the crime committed.
I don not find it cruel or unusual that murderers be made to suffer. Their indifference should be a consideration in their execution.
Time to bring back Scaphism.
No, our founding fathers expressly forbid cruel and unusual punishment for a reason.
SCOTUS ruled that "all punishments which by their excessive length or severity are greatly disproportionate to the offenses charged.” in a proportionality ruling, where as the inverse can be applied as all punishments which by their severity are greatly proportionate to the offenses.
Mohammad Anwar, the man laying dead on the pavement, wasn't afforded any such luxury of limits to the depravity and violence done to him and Justice demands that the severity of punishment be suitable in character to the crime committed.
I don not find it cruel or unusual that murderers be made to suffer. Their indifference should be a consideration in their execution.
Perhaps then, and only then. Knowing that such a fate would befall you would make you think twice before being a piece of shit human being. Perhaps...