100% Official Influenza Positive Tests Reported to CDC by U.S. Clinical Laboratories 2016-17: 131,718 2017-18: 229,354 2018-19: 183,023 2019-20: 250,467 2020-21: 1,639 (0.654% of previous year total)
That's right, positive tests are LESS THAN 1% of what they were in 2019-20!
5-Year Chart: http://www.imagebam.com/image/85a86f1373295922
Official CDC Data: 2016-17: http://archive.today/NBVeJ 2017-18: http://archive.today/QH8NI 2018-19: http://archive.today/c3eUg 2019-20: http://archive.today/YAsyb 2020-21: http://archive.today/TAVHD
The cdc still hasnt reported the total deaths all causes for 2020... They can tell us how many covid deaths and how many more deaths than the previous year but not the totals.
Without knowing the totals the claims about covid deaths are suspicious considering the possibility of false positives and flawed testing or diagnoses without testing. If the total deaths and death rate are the same as 2019 then some heads better start rolling.
I was looking around the CDC website all day, trying to find equivalent numbers for covid. I found 2019-20 (390,489) but then there is no data after this. Instead they are just using "reported cases" and/or "total tests" (as opposed to just clinical laboratory tests as in the flu data). They are deliberately trying to inflate the covid number by not reporting this data. But worse is the rate of positive flu tests, which is not remotely believable. Positive testing rate for flu 2019-20: 16.455%. Positive testing rate for flu 2020-21: 0.209%. That's not 2%, that 0.2%, not an error. This has to mean either something truly miraculous happened, or the laboratories are intentionally reporting positive tests as negative (or the CDC is reporting them like that). This is either a heinous abuse of government power, in which case every single person involved should be jailed, or it is an actual medical miracle that no doctor seems to want to share or take credit for.
Right, show me the total deaths and I'll start to believe the covid numbers if the totals are in fact way up for the year.
And yeah the lack of flu deaths... I mean it strongly indicates that they're misdiagnosing or possibly it could be said that these individuals had health issues that were going to lead to their death regardless of which virus was involved.
That's why we need to see the raw total deaths numbers, all causes. Ita possible that all of those people did actually die of covid not the flu, as if covid is a dominant virus, but if the total deaths year over year are the same approximately then it's going to indicate that the people dying were people with failing immune systems already and statistically speaking they were going to die anyway.
That's not to completely diminish the effects of covid, every healthy adult or child that had no pre-existing conditions and died of covid is a true tragedy and it angers me to think that they could have been killed by a mistake (or not) made by a research lab... But I strongly suspect that we'll find that the actual risk was always very minimal, the numbers were hyper inflated and the lockdowns were unnecessary.