Where was there an ad hominem? Do you even know what that means?
Further, if you just want to pretend that quotes from Fauci, links to the CDC etc aren't relevant, then I guess the discussion is over because you've made it clear that you're not interested in a reasonable discussion.
WHAT IS BEING CALLED A 'VACCINE' IS ACTUALLY EXPERIMENTAL GENE-THERAPY. IT IS IN NO WAY A VACCINE IN A TRADITIONAL SENSE.
WRAPPING VIRAL RNA IN LIPOSOMES WHICH CAN PASS THROUGH OUR CELL MEMBRANES WITH NO DIFFICULTY IS ASKING FOR TROUBLE.
AND NONE OF YOUR 'QUOTES' ADDRESS THE ONE THING I WAS ASKING YOU TO ADDRESS: 'THESE VACCINES CAUSE IMMUNITY AND PREVENT THE SPREAD OF THE DISEASE BY ANYONE WHO HAS HAD THE VACCINE'
I.E.E.G. THE SMALLPOX VACCINE.
t. MICROBIOLOGIST (PATHOLOGY DoD) IN AN EARLIER LIFE.
False. An ad hominem is specifically when an insult is the argument itself. Verbal abuse along with an actual argument and information addressing the point is not an ad hominem.
False. Not gene therapy. Doesn't touch your DNA in any way. You're lying. Stop it.
False. Your cells and plenty of other structures are wrapped in lipids forming liposomes. There are numerous other regulatory mechanisms to control what passes through them etc.
False. I did address it. The vaccines do cause immunity just like existing vaccines. They may not prevent against new strains, just like flu vaccines, but will likely reduce symptoms even then, again just like flu vaccines.
If you're claiming you're a microbiologist I may just die laughing because you have zero clue what you're talking about and are ignorantly repeating false claims you saw on social media.
Where was there an ad hominem? Do you even know what that means?
Further, if you just want to pretend that quotes from Fauci, links to the CDC etc aren't relevant, then I guess the discussion is over because you've made it clear that you're not interested in a reasonable discussion.
Thanks for your time.
CALLING SOMEONE A RETARD IS AN AD HOMINEM.
WHAT IS BEING CALLED A 'VACCINE' IS ACTUALLY EXPERIMENTAL GENE-THERAPY. IT IS IN NO WAY A VACCINE IN A TRADITIONAL SENSE.
WRAPPING VIRAL RNA IN LIPOSOMES WHICH CAN PASS THROUGH OUR CELL MEMBRANES WITH NO DIFFICULTY IS ASKING FOR TROUBLE.
AND NONE OF YOUR 'QUOTES' ADDRESS THE ONE THING I WAS ASKING YOU TO ADDRESS: 'THESE VACCINES CAUSE IMMUNITY AND PREVENT THE SPREAD OF THE DISEASE BY ANYONE WHO HAS HAD THE VACCINE'
I.E.E.G. THE SMALLPOX VACCINE.
t. MICROBIOLOGIST (PATHOLOGY DoD) IN AN EARLIER LIFE.
False. An ad hominem is specifically when an insult is the argument itself. Verbal abuse along with an actual argument and information addressing the point is not an ad hominem.
False. Not gene therapy. Doesn't touch your DNA in any way. You're lying. Stop it.
False. Your cells and plenty of other structures are wrapped in lipids forming liposomes. There are numerous other regulatory mechanisms to control what passes through them etc.
False. I did address it. The vaccines do cause immunity just like existing vaccines. They may not prevent against new strains, just like flu vaccines, but will likely reduce symptoms even then, again just like flu vaccines.
If you're claiming you're a microbiologist I may just die laughing because you have zero clue what you're talking about and are ignorantly repeating false claims you saw on social media.
WE'RE DONE CHANG.
YOU'RE FULL OF SHIT.
Chang?
Hey, if that's the best argument you've gone, like I said, we're done. Glad we at least agree on that.