444
posted ago by riesling ago by riesling +445 / -1

Liberals have learned a lot from the post 9/11 era. And they all adore George W Bush now, thanks especially to Michelle Obama cuddling up to him in public at every opportunity.

Now liberals can track you wherever you go using your cellphone. They'll know where you shop, where you eat, how you eat, where you live - HOW YOU THINK AND FEEL ABOUT EVERYTHING.

Your thoughts are no longer your thoughts.

Big Brother aka Big Government operatives will soon be literally watching you.

They will then share that data with banks and Silicon Valley corporations who will then decide whether or not to permanently separate you from your own money. AND whether or not to permanently de-person you from using the Internet.

Think that's far-fetched?

What if Bank Of America decides you're an insurrectionist and in collaboration with the Government locks you out of your bank account?

And what if Sundar Pichai-led Google bans your phone's MAC address from ever accessing Google again?

All because the Government was able to access some or other data and your movements on your phone via the 'Digital Passport' that their 'algorithms' flagged as 'problematic'?

REMEMBER: NO LAWYER WILL DEFEND YOU OR HELP YOU SUE THE GOVERNMENT/BIG TECH/BANKS ETC. AS MOST TRIAL LAWYERS AND CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ARE HARDCORE DEMOCRATS, AND ACTIVELY WORK FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, AND ARE DEMOCRAT OPERATIVES.

Many thanks to feminist women for cheering on this shit and urging everyone else to 'sacrifice for the common good'.

Comments (14)
sorted by:
7
Truthdose 7 points ago +8 / -1

PATRIOT ACT 5

6
befehlistbefehl 6 points ago +7 / -1

What if Bank Of America decides you're an insurrectionist and in collaboration with the Government locks you out of your bank account?

Run out of Bubblegum.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely time to watch that movie again

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Liberty_Prime 3 points ago +6 / -3

I would advise you not to discourage lawsuits against constitutional infringement.

It's defeatist and inaccurate to assume that a lawyer wouldn't want their name enshrined as precedent in the Supreme Court.

-2
riesling [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Why on earth would any trial lawyer (Most of them Democrat AND all their professional organizations being Democrat) want his name enshrined in SCOTUS for being a bad liberal globalist commie?

3
AbsoluteChad 3 points ago +4 / -1

You misunderstand why so many lawyers are democrats. Republicans pass laws that prevent lawyers from suing big business. Remember how the R’s wanted covid immunity bills for businesses? Republicans are always trying to make it harder for lawyers to sue businesses. So if you’re a lawyer who sues businesses, what party are you going to support?

Yes a lot of lawyers are bleeding heart liberals. But a whole lot of them just love money and vote D because voting R means they take home a lot less money. Trust me - if there’s a 9-figure lawsuit that’s winnable against Silicon Valley, there won’t be a lawyer shortage.

3
Liberty_Prime 3 points ago +6 / -3

Isn't it a little early to be drunk?

You told people here not to get lawyers to defend them.

-3
riesling [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

Lmao isn't it too soon to be pulling out the ad hominem attacks when you've refused to acknowledge the all too obvious reality that the vast majority of trial lawyers are Democrats? And that the Trial Lawyers Association is a hard-left Democrat machine? And that Donald Trump himself has been struggling to find legal representation because of this especially to fight election fraud?

Look at the reality, you vague, obfuscating, delusional dumbass (you opened the ad hominem attack door here). Are you really that stupid or willfully in denial of how many lawyers were behind the relentless and ruthless attacks on Trump and his entire administration?

The fucking ABA (American Bar Association, since you appear to have snorted all your coke early today) attacked him and opposed him and his administration.

Where the fuck are you going to find all these 'based' lawyers?

3
Liberty_Prime 3 points ago +5 / -2

Who defended the baker shop that refused to bake the wedding cake?

-3
riesling [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

Ah yes the one single little law firm that could! First a small bakery, next potentially hundreds/ thousands? of plaintiffs trapped in a mobile tracking scheme involving GPS and celltowers and government surveillance.

7
Liberty_Prime 7 points ago +9 / -2

Look, you can go sulk in a corner, refusing to fight back legally. Just don't try and drag others with you to your pity hole.

That's all.

You get the last word.

4
honkpillfarmer 4 points ago +5 / -1

Redditor faggot spotted

2
dude_bro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nuremberg Trials had a lot to do with forced medical experiments. IsraelI’d already went to The Hague about this medical tyranny