1372
Comments (51)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
CucksForTheDonald 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dude, the whole point is that no one knows. The proper way to look at this is the outside view, not the inside view.

The outside view is: how many times have we done something like this, and how did it turn out? How often do new things turn out to be 100% OK and safe after we rush them? How is our track record here? (Our track record is reliably bad.)

The inside view is: what data do we have right now about the vaccines? (Here, the VAERS reports come in, which exceed reports associated with the flu vaccine by hundreds of times. Then, account for that doctors' and nurses' careers are being threatened, that media chooses what and how to report on the basis of political alignment, that social media are suppressed, people are being banned, etc.)

So now, knowing all this, you ask someone who claims to be a "based" doctor? Like they know?

Don't take the damn vaccine if you can help it. Chances are you're going to feel great about that decision in 5 years.

9
arebee 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don’t think he knows. They weren’t aware of the short term effects, there was no warning. Lol.

So if they didn’t even know about the short term effects, how can they claim it’s safe since they don’t know the long term effects.

Anyone pushing it needs the bullet.