I’m starting to think we need a comic of George Floyd jumping in front of 3 people who are tied up about to get fentanyl injected into them by Chauvin and instead takes all 3 needles to save their lives. 😂
Let's forget about MLK already and start to appreciate MILFs. They inspire every capable man, young & older to erect himself, stand tall & with great fervor, hearts pounding & blood pumping. Unlike MLK, MILFs have united all men with common purpose, to be better & bigger men. Tents are being pitched every where MILFs are within sight. God speed, MILFs.
They have made a martyr out of him. They still have the area where he died closed off to traffic and have named it George Floyd Square. It’s destroying businesses in the area and crime there is high.
Not really. It's the combo of fentanyl and morphine and the other stuff that went over the top. The normal lethal dose for fentanyl is 2mg total dose and he had a blood level of 11ng/ml. Assuming 5 liters of blood, he took 55ug of fentanyl which is about 1/20th of the lethal dose. It is enough for anesthesia though. And people have died from as little as 7ng/ml if they were also taking morphine. So he definitely ODed, but be careful saying it was just fentanyl because people can prove you wrong.
You cannot make a direct comparison of the dose and blood concentration.
Metabolism matters, so one has to look at the blood level of fentanyl of the people who are know to have died from it.
People who died from fentanyl overdose had readings from 0.75 ng/mL to an astounding 113 ng/mL. The average death dose was 9.96 ng/mL.
Yep. I was providing lay person understanding so that the public in general don't sound like complete idiots when saying what is actually true. That just hurts our cause. The source for the article you linked has very complicated data that they don't use enough math on. They lumped a host of case studies with varying doses of co-intoxicants into one giant group and then used a simple average. They completely ignored a multi-variable problem and tried to cover it up with strong statistics that don't address a fundamental problem. Yes, fentanyl is inextricably linked to the deaths of these people like the stats say, but the lethal dose of fentanyl required can't be determined this way. That won't hold water with anyone who knows anything about drug dosing. The most you could say is that Floyd's death was within the range of lethal doses with co-intoxicants and he had other intoxicant in his system. But you couldn't say that he likely ODed because he was over the average of 9.94ng/ml because they didn't do a multivariate analysis to determine the contribution of the different drugs to the lethal dose. Even then the math doesn't necessarily reflect reality because of metabolism. Morphine and fentanyl have a synergistic effect but other intoxicant's may not.
Your numbers work, but since he swallowed it a) it was at least 9x more raw product (500ug), and it might not all have absorbed by the time he died. So he may have swallowed enough to kill 3 people via IV, however he took it orally and may have died before it all made it's way into his blood. TLDR: We don't really know.
But this is just splitting hairs. The cross-drug interaction as you indicated is the real cause of death here.
According to the CDC levels of fentanyl above 3ng/ml are often fatal. Levels above 9.5 appear to always be fatal. Georgie’s were 11. While the cocktail of drugs in his system did not help, that much fentanyl was more than enough to kill him.
Fairly sure I heard the prosecutor say that we would hear his levels were 11, but that this doesn't take into account the level of resistance he'd have built up through extensive use.
Can't wait for the medical experts to provide testimony on that one.
That's a small case study of 12 people with the majority also taking cocaine. You can't derive the lethal dose for a single compound when the data is derived from multi-drug use patients. Fentanyl is used in hospitals at anesthetic doses ranging from 11-20 ng/ml. Just getting over 9.5ng/ml is not fatal by itself.
I can't wait for it!! Let them burn it all to the ground. Im in NYC and i hope they burn it to the ground here as well. My neighborhood in the BX is based and we have men with guns here that will not let that foolishness enter.
Let these f*ckin animals kill each other, we need a purge. 😎🔥
My neighborhood is. It's way up north, right on the border. One of the last few hold outs, but the savages are creeping in unfortunately. Muh Diversity housing. Ugh. I'm out of this state in a year anyways.
Heard somewhere that he is willing to admit to a lessor manslaughter charge and also agreed to do 10 years in prison for it despite the typical time served for the charge being 3 years or something or another. He is worried about other charges he is facing not just the first degree murder charge. Better to spend 10 years in prison than 25 to life.
An inch is a mile. They won't plead anyways. They want the circus trial. Either they convict wrongfully and show that all justice is woke tyranny and the french terror and imprisonment, or they get their riots. Either is a win for them.
The only course is to fight everything and let them have their riot.
6 times tha average fentanyl found in other fatal OD's. So those are people with with more than the LD of fentanyl themselves. Maybe 2x average (it killed them didn't it ?)
Makes me think of what's someone on here said a while back. Chauvin's defense should just be his lawyer laying on the floor for 9 minutes while Chauvin kneels on him the same exact way. Then after 9 minutes just get up and go sit back down. Bring in a lab rat and show the jury a single dot of fentynal, then give it to the rat. Watch it die almost instantly then just say something like "George Floyd had 10 times the amount we just gave that rat adjusted for his body weight" then leave the rat there and sit down
That's not true. Joe was able to read the numbers by each picture, to know who to call on, in order, AND, he was able to read the pre written answer cards for each pre planned question. IIRC, he only read off the wrong answer to one question. When the pre-scripted gun control question came up, he started talking about raising the roads 3 feet. Maybe that is part of his gun control plan, who really knows?
Additionally, he answered some of the pre-arranged questions while looking up. Did he have teleprompters for that in the room? If not, then he did a pretty fair job of memorizing those answers. He only went blank a half dozen times or so, over an hour long presser. Frankly, I was impressed that he was able to stand that long, then walk off under his own power. His medical team definitely got the dosages right that day.
Drunk Nancy called it the legacy of "George Kirby" during a press conference. Combined with the golden caskets, four funerals, horse drawn carriage, TV coverage, state-sponsored riots, it eventually dawned on everyone that we witnessed a saint, thus St. Fentanyl Kirby.
And all these grand affairs were held during a “deadly pandemic” when we could only have outdoor funerals and no guests for our own relatives that died.
The defence should challenge the official autopsy upfront. It rules homicide, specifically relating to the accusation of mechanical asphyxiation.
Yet there is not a single finding in the autopsy to support this ruling. This proves that the ruling of the official autopsy is fraudulent.
That ruling has been release to the public and would influence public perception including that of the jury. The defence also needs to open on that straight away for that the prosecution isn't basing their arguments on it.
Otherwise you have the defence in a situation of arguing why it's homicide but Chauvin isn't culpable when it's not been established that its homicide.
The problem is that they like the homicide to the restraint so it's meant specifically.
The autopsy says one thing and the ruling at the top for the COD says something else entirely different.
If I remember it says he died due to being restrained in layman's terms. Then it says homicide.
The rest of the autopsy shows zero physical evidence of lethal restraint and it's quite thorough.
It's the same as if I took the cover from out book and swapped it with another.
The cover page for the autopsy report reads as though it's from a different autopsy and got mixed up.
Except it can't be that because they're marked to match up each page so that can't happen so it can only be fraud.
If I buy a DVD called "The police killed him by restraining him.", then take the DVD out and put it in the player only to watch a film about a man dying of a drug overdose that's an obvious and undeniable error.
It's also not one in this specific case that could be easily explained by accident.
"The official autopsy concluded that Floyd’s death was a homicide." No, the real (original) autopsy found nothing but massive amounts of drugs. Then the family got an independent autopsy to "find" what they wanted.
27 mill bucks those fine people got for raising a shitty drug addict criminal who attacks pregnant women in armed home invasions ..... I want a refund .
Those were Hennepin county paramedics. You can tell by the color of their uniform. It's not uncommon for them to wear body armor in this neighborhood. That's where we're at in this neighborhood.
I'm not familiar with the details of the events but just a guess - they were there to protect the paramedics in case Floyd woke up. Opiate addicts are sometimes delirious or angry when they wake up with naloxone in their system and Floyd had a history of violence and erratic behaviour.
Im a fire fighter and my father in law is an emt... the police never ride in an ambulance the emts have shit to put the patient to sleep so no police are needed
It only works because they're going into medical care where things can be monitored and corrected as various drugs wear off. If you just took all these drugs and passed out on your couch it would be very rough on you.
Patent on website was shown 3 hrs after the announcement of the pandemic, as per Titus Frost channel via youtube, bitchute, dlive, etc.
Titus has a good habit of referencing show notes on familiar page linked through his channel. I need to work on having all of that info/intel before bumping my gums through this message board.
Of course, poor Chauvin cannot possibly have a fair trial with how the coverage influenced the entire globe. Odds are 9/10 people in that jury already have their minds made up and aren't moving. Maybe their will be one person willing to be open minded, and that could mean all the difference
Mixed-race woman in her 20s Getting a chance to serve on the Chauvin jury was the reason this young woman registered to vote, she told the court. “I was super-excited” to be called for the jury, she said. "That’s actually why I voted.”
The young woman, whose occupation didn't come up during jury questioning, has an uncle who works as a police officer in northern Minnesota. One of her only concerns about jury duty was whether she would have time to check her blood sugar because she has Type 1 diabetes.
Like some other jurors, she said she could face personal risk by serving. “But I’m not as concerned about it as I probably should be,” she said.
Friends “kind of consider me to a type of mediator,” she said, which could be helpful during jury deliberations.
She said she believes her community improved because of the massive protests that took place after Floyd’s death. Asked about her opinion on Black Lives Matter, she said, “I like the idea of what it's supposed to be about. But it’s been turned into a marketing scheme by companies.”
She noted that she’d heard some people mention that Floyd had drugs in his system. “I don’t necessarily agree” that drugs could have caused his death, she said. “It could have everything to do with it. It could have nothing to do with it.”
Getting a chance to serve on the Chauvin jury was the reason this young woman registered to vote,
She was just talking about jury duty in general. She even says "I didn't know what it was, I didn't care what it was, I was just excited to be summoned".
The only perspective juror that I heard about that may have chosen to acquit was the one that feared for his safety and his identity being revealed. He was dismissed.
Not just the coverage, the house passed some George Floyd reform policing act, that basically says these officers are guilty ahead of the trial. If that isn't grounds for throwing this out I don't know what is. Chauvin will never get a fair trial.
I know we have freedom of speech still (I think) but we ought to be jailing all the people with large media platforms who immediately started calling this murder because they are the reason this guy will never get a fair trial. They destroyed this man with w reckless political speech which amounted to flat our lies.
This is why I defend the UK's media reporting restrictions on criminal trials. Lots of Americans got upset at Tommy Robinson being prosecuted for contempt of court but it's explicitly to assure a fair trial.
Do all the reporting you like after the trial, even share the statements made in court, but the US media carnival makes a mockery what was already a shitshow of a justice system.
It's disturbing how powerful the media is. They edited and withheld footage to frame a police officer for doing his job and half the population is too stupid to notice.
They edited President Trump saying peacefully and patriotically. That pencil neck dog shit Schiff lied and gave his interpretation of the ukraine phone call. They do this because no one stops them. They lie to our faces and treat us like chumps, and we let them.
Well did ya see how much publicity there was leading up to the trial? Mr and Ms Corporate Suburban Consumers on the jury don't have an original thought in their heads.
Seems to me that this can't possibly be a fair trial. I've never been on a trial (thank god!) but isn't one of the questions, have you heard about this before?
I think my Father or someone else told me they heard someone slip up and say "Yeah I read about it in the Paper" or maybe it was my Grandfather when he was called for a jury many decades ago. And they booted him because he had some background of the case before walking in.
Mixed-race woman in her 20s
Getting a chance to serve on the Chauvin jury was the reason this young woman registered to vote, she told the court. “I was super-excited” to be called for the jury, she said. "That’s actually why I voted.”
The young woman, whose occupation didn't come up during jury questioning, has an uncle who works as a police officer in northern Minnesota. One of her only concerns about jury duty was whether she would have time to check her blood sugar because she has Type 1 diabetes.
Like some other jurors, she said she could face personal risk by serving. “But I’m not as concerned about it as I probably should be,” she said.
Friends “kind of consider me to a type of mediator,” she said, which could be helpful during jury deliberations.
She said she believes her community improved because of the massive protests that took place after Floyd’s death. Asked about her opinion on Black Lives Matter, she said, “I like the idea of what it's supposed to be about. But it’s been turned into a marketing scheme by companies.”
She noted that she’d heard some people mention that Floyd had drugs in his system. “I don’t necessarily agree” that drugs could have caused his death, she said. “It could have everything to do with it. It could have nothing to do with it.”
I'd think that she would be disqualified from serving EITHER WAY. Her familial relations would either make her sympathetic to the police (1% chance of that actually based on all of the other comments) or 99% sympathetic to the victim. Surprised the defense didn't get her booted out. And if they didn't want to boot her, imagine what the other juror candidates were about.
she believes her community improved because of the massive protests
LOL. You could take a giant dump in the middle of her community and light it one fire and it would improve her community instantly. She has no community. She only believes all those thugs and criminals are a community because they all have the same skin color and "community" has been a buzzword in those types of communities for at last 30 years.
I blame Nancy Grace for the current state of this. She is the first person I remember who had a show doing that very thing day after day. She's now at FOX.
They dont care. They will still blame white people and the system. Those in power don't live in the chaos they create. They are never held accountable either. Let the whole place burn, i only wish they will be caught in the mayhem and lose their lives as well.
This is what happens when you bow to the mob. They will never be satisfied, ever.
Opening arguments, main arguments and closing statements takes less than 20 minutes. Heres the coroners report showing no damage to the neck, toxicology report showing he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him 3 times over, the police training handbook showing the appropriate hold to put someone in on the ground, and finally the video showing Fentanyl Floyd saying he can not breathe while in the car and asking to be put on the ground.
I really wish this was televised so we could see all the evidence ourselves.. MSM will cherry pick the fuck out of this. After having cities all over America burned down over this specific case - we deserve to witness the entire process and all the evidence.
The hold used by the officer was part of the training materials used to train officers.
George Floyd was dead before they pulled him over, the hold had nothing to do with it. George Floyd was high on narcotics and in possession of narcotics (dropped on camera when placed on the ground).
3 other officers were in close proximity and did not see an issue.
Yes an no. The official autopsy is fraudulent. Specifically the cause of death. It says homicide as the cause of death but when you read the entire autopsy not only is there nothing to support that but the physical findings demonstrate that it was not homicide. Rather natural causes, well as natural as a heart attack is when also infected with COVID-19 and an overdose of class A drugs is while also suffering from hypertension and heart illness.
All the defence has to do is take the coroner to the stand and ask how they ruled it a homicide. The whole thing crumbles.
Why were the cops there, again? Oh yea, because drug addict criminal Floyd was trying to pass counterfeit currency in a local business.
They'll never be held to account for it, but all those bystanders hooting and hollering, threatening those officers, are just as responsible for Floyd's death as the officers themselves (neither party is as responsible as Floyd himself).
When people approach officers in the middle of making an arrest, that officer has to assume their intentions are hostile. This divides their attention between the subject of the arrest and the bystanders, who could be armed.
Seem like maybe Chauvin's attention being divided had something to do with him not noticing that Floyd was OD'ing?
this trial is a show. it clearly wasn't murder in the legal sense (man-slaughter maybe, not murder). he is forced to be found "not guilty" by definition. they ramped up the charges knowing this full-well. it's a way to shut up the folks (giving them a sense of justice/revenge) while at the same time protecting their own.
the jury will be scrutinizing Chauvin, e.g. his posture, facial expressions, breathing (like sighing or yawning), etc., and will project their own meaning on each of their observations
he'll fare better if he appears to be paying rapt attention to everything by taking "notes" (even if he's just writing over and over: All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy)
Defense Opening Statement: "Dindu Nuffin was a scumbag, drug-dealing felon who died from an overdose of multiple illegal drugs. Officer Chauvin should be receiving a medal. The defense rests."
Any juror who votes "not guilty" knows that an angry mob is going to burn down their home. There's no way that a few Antfia/BLM supporters didn't make it onto the jury. The best Chauvin can do is a hung jury.
The prosecutor can't even make up their mind on whether this is first, second or third degree murder. So why not argue for all 3? If not for the massively friendly jury, this case would've probably been tossed by now.
Also, is it just me or is the prosecutor appear to deliberately be trying to fail?
It's all theater. The verdict is already in. I'm not paying attention to this farce. The fact that the trial wasn't moved says everything you need to know.
George Floyd had enough fentanyl in his system to kill 3 people.
So you are saying George Floyd saved 3 people from death? What an Angel.
He took three for the team, a true icon for civil rights! This is what MLK was talking about!
I’m starting to think we need a comic of George Floyd jumping in front of 3 people who are tied up about to get fentanyl injected into them by Chauvin and instead takes all 3 needles to save their lives. 😂
This would be a hilarious Ben Garrison.
Let's forget about MLK already and start to appreciate MILFs. They inspire every capable man, young & older to erect himself, stand tall & with great fervor, hearts pounding & blood pumping. Unlike MLK, MILFs have united all men with common purpose, to be better & bigger men. Tents are being pitched every where MILFs are within sight. God speed, MILFs.
They have made a martyr out of him. They still have the area where he died closed off to traffic and have named it George Floyd Square. It’s destroying businesses in the area and crime there is high.
SAINT FLOYD
STINK FLOYD
As big of a piece of shit in death, as he was in life.
Fitting.
It’s what he would have wanted
Get him a golden casket! Medal of honor! $21 mil settlement!
$27 million *
Minneapolis should have used some of that money to build a memorial to George fentanyl kirby. They deserve it.
Honor Roll
Not really. It's the combo of fentanyl and morphine and the other stuff that went over the top. The normal lethal dose for fentanyl is 2mg total dose and he had a blood level of 11ng/ml. Assuming 5 liters of blood, he took 55ug of fentanyl which is about 1/20th of the lethal dose. It is enough for anesthesia though. And people have died from as little as 7ng/ml if they were also taking morphine. So he definitely ODed, but be careful saying it was just fentanyl because people can prove you wrong.
You cannot make a direct comparison of the dose and blood concentration.
Metabolism matters, so one has to look at the blood level of fentanyl of the people who are know to have died from it.
https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/07/what-is-a-fatal-dose-of-fentanyl/.
So yeah, it's quite likely that Saint George OD'd on fentanyl alone.
Yep. I was providing lay person understanding so that the public in general don't sound like complete idiots when saying what is actually true. That just hurts our cause. The source for the article you linked has very complicated data that they don't use enough math on. They lumped a host of case studies with varying doses of co-intoxicants into one giant group and then used a simple average. They completely ignored a multi-variable problem and tried to cover it up with strong statistics that don't address a fundamental problem. Yes, fentanyl is inextricably linked to the deaths of these people like the stats say, but the lethal dose of fentanyl required can't be determined this way. That won't hold water with anyone who knows anything about drug dosing. The most you could say is that Floyd's death was within the range of lethal doses with co-intoxicants and he had other intoxicant in his system. But you couldn't say that he likely ODed because he was over the average of 9.94ng/ml because they didn't do a multivariate analysis to determine the contribution of the different drugs to the lethal dose. Even then the math doesn't necessarily reflect reality because of metabolism. Morphine and fentanyl have a synergistic effect but other intoxicant's may not.
Your numbers work, but since he swallowed it a) it was at least 9x more raw product (500ug), and it might not all have absorbed by the time he died. So he may have swallowed enough to kill 3 people via IV, however he took it orally and may have died before it all made it's way into his blood. TLDR: We don't really know.
But this is just splitting hairs. The cross-drug interaction as you indicated is the real cause of death here.
According to the CDC levels of fentanyl above 3ng/ml are often fatal. Levels above 9.5 appear to always be fatal. Georgie’s were 11. While the cocktail of drugs in his system did not help, that much fentanyl was more than enough to kill him.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/pdfs/mm6604a4.pdf
Fairly sure I heard the prosecutor say that we would hear his levels were 11, but that this doesn't take into account the level of resistance he'd have built up through extensive use.
Can't wait for the medical experts to provide testimony on that one.
That's a small case study of 12 people with the majority also taking cocaine. You can't derive the lethal dose for a single compound when the data is derived from multi-drug use patients. Fentanyl is used in hospitals at anesthetic doses ranging from 11-20 ng/ml. Just getting over 9.5ng/ml is not fatal by itself.
Not to mention he had two kinds of heart disease and COVID.
I'm not really a horse. I'm a broom.
The prosecution was saying that fent isn't actually that dangerous lmao....can't make this shit up.
The irony is that democrats already over sensationalized the opioid crisis and fentanyl crisis from a few years back.....
it's 6 times you liars !
Just like MN’s own beloved icon Prince.
Tom Petty RIP
When does the Fentynal get put on trial?
It's got CCP diplomatic immunity.
They are the ones that need the trial.
kaffir lover!
But sir, you are blick!
The CCP didn't make it in a lab, it was created in nature by animals.
It's like reverse opium wars here, China's revenge.
Too late. Fentanyl fled back home to Hunter Bidens bloodstream. No extradition treaty.
Free Derek Chauvin! He was a good man keeping his community safe.
Gotta weed out the good ones first before filling out the ranks with antifa tranny affirmative action hires.
This kangaroo court isn’t going to help.
The trial is a mess. It really would be tough to be on that jury, because the protestors outside that courtroom are insane and there will be doxxing
Just like the Supreme Court, mob rule will get its way. Jurors who believe he's innocent will be forced to vote guilty in fear of their life
It's gonna be a shit show .... and I fear he'll be made an example.
Whats funny is whether he gets wrongfully convicted or rightfully acquitted Minneapolis is still going to burn.
I can't wait for it!! Let them burn it all to the ground. Im in NYC and i hope they burn it to the ground here as well. My neighborhood in the BX is based and we have men with guns here that will not let that foolishness enter.
Let these f*ckin animals kill each other, we need a purge. 😎🔥
& nothing was lost
Bronx is based?? Since when? Best of luck pede. Defend your neighbors
My neighborhood is. It's way up north, right on the border. One of the last few hold outs, but the savages are creeping in unfortunately. Muh Diversity housing. Ugh. I'm out of this state in a year anyways.
Heard somewhere that he is willing to admit to a lessor manslaughter charge and also agreed to do 10 years in prison for it despite the typical time served for the charge being 3 years or something or another. He is worried about other charges he is facing not just the first degree murder charge. Better to spend 10 years in prison than 25 to life.
If he was going for a plea bargain I don’t think we would be having the trial.
The issue is the feds are waiting in the wings to press charges if the prosecution fucks up.
If he pleas out they will just come in with federal charges which they are almost certainly putting together.
I get my info from Robert Barnes.
What a disgrace.
An inch is a mile. They won't plead anyways. They want the circus trial. Either they convict wrongfully and show that all justice is woke tyranny and the french terror and imprisonment, or they get their riots. Either is a win for them.
The only course is to fight everything and let them have their riot.
No plea will be taken.
I believe he will be made as an example. All White police officers should take note, and resign immediately.
Defense should just put up the toxicology report and stare at it for 10 minutes. Then without saying a word sit down.
6 times tha average fentanyl found in other fatal OD's. So those are people with with more than the LD of fentanyl themselves. Maybe 2x average (it killed them didn't it ?)
So maybe 12 times or more the LD
Floyd was MADE of Fentanyl
Makes me think of what's someone on here said a while back. Chauvin's defense should just be his lawyer laying on the floor for 9 minutes while Chauvin kneels on him the same exact way. Then after 9 minutes just get up and go sit back down. Bring in a lab rat and show the jury a single dot of fentynal, then give it to the rat. Watch it die almost instantly then just say something like "George Floyd had 10 times the amount we just gave that rat adjusted for his body weight" then leave the rat there and sit down
They'd disbar and charge the lawyer immediately for cruelty to rats. Then convict anyways on muh feelings.
I love how the prosecution was basically saying "He couldn't have died from being over the lethal amount because his body was used to it".
Epstein didn't kill himself. But Floyd did.
I can’t breef
I can’t read!*
Readin’ is acting like a honkey
If you can read ,you ain't....
-Joepedo
Joe can’t read, that’s why he had a picture book during his press conference.
That's not true. Joe was able to read the numbers by each picture, to know who to call on, in order, AND, he was able to read the pre written answer cards for each pre planned question. IIRC, he only read off the wrong answer to one question. When the pre-scripted gun control question came up, he started talking about raising the roads 3 feet. Maybe that is part of his gun control plan, who really knows?
Additionally, he answered some of the pre-arranged questions while looking up. Did he have teleprompters for that in the room? If not, then he did a pretty fair job of memorizing those answers. He only went blank a half dozen times or so, over an hour long presser. Frankly, I was impressed that he was able to stand that long, then walk off under his own power. His medical team definitely got the dosages right that day.
After he died from an OD all the black folks in NYC were wearing masks that said "i can't breathe". No shit dummy, take the mask off and you can.
I can't BREED
If only!!! That would solve alot of problems.
MUH BREEVES!
His name was Fentanyl Floyd, get it right
St. Fentanyl Kirby you stupid xigot!
Out of the loop on the whole "George Kirby" thing. What is this referring to? Besides Floyd, of course.
Drunk Nancy called it the legacy of "George Kirby" during a press conference. Combined with the golden caskets, four funerals, horse drawn carriage, TV coverage, state-sponsored riots, it eventually dawned on everyone that we witnessed a saint, thus St. Fentanyl Kirby.
And all these grand affairs were held during a “deadly pandemic” when we could only have outdoor funerals and no guests for our own relatives that died.
Kind of like st pancake.
Lest we not forget, the mayors knee drop to crocodile tears during the ceremony. Truly cringe-worthy material, I say to you.
Hahaha saw the clip and she sounds stoned as hell. At least she gave us St. Kirby.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFUSu4qpvd8
That's hilarious. Thank you
https://kekpe.pe/i/605fb2dfa3390.jpg
“My client has undergone a radical transformation and now identifies as a black female”
... Not Guilty”
The defence should challenge the official autopsy upfront. It rules homicide, specifically relating to the accusation of mechanical asphyxiation.
Yet there is not a single finding in the autopsy to support this ruling. This proves that the ruling of the official autopsy is fraudulent.
That ruling has been release to the public and would influence public perception including that of the jury. The defence also needs to open on that straight away for that the prosecution isn't basing their arguments on it.
Otherwise you have the defence in a situation of arguing why it's homicide but Chauvin isn't culpable when it's not been established that its homicide.
A shame the video doesn't work.
Yup. How does an autopsy report conclude homicide without any evidence? Corruption and weak men influenced by the violent mob. Violence works I guess.
I've often questioned how an autopsy can or ahpuld declare homicide in any case. That's not what an autopsy is for.
Gesundheit.
Danke.
It's fraud and when they take the prosecution to the stand they'll have to openly admit to the crime in court.
This raises a question because it's a very obvious fraud. I get the impression the coroner was ordered to rule it a homicide.
Then any good defense will put the coroner on the stand. Hopefully he has a good defense.
Homicide in that context doesn't mean anything other than caused by a human's action. Suicide by fentanyl is homicide
The problem is that they like the homicide to the restraint so it's meant specifically.
The autopsy says one thing and the ruling at the top for the COD says something else entirely different.
If I remember it says he died due to being restrained in layman's terms. Then it says homicide.
The rest of the autopsy shows zero physical evidence of lethal restraint and it's quite thorough.
It's the same as if I took the cover from out book and swapped it with another.
The cover page for the autopsy report reads as though it's from a different autopsy and got mixed up.
Except it can't be that because they're marked to match up each page so that can't happen so it can only be fraud.
If I buy a DVD called "The police killed him by restraining him.", then take the DVD out and put it in the player only to watch a film about a man dying of a drug overdose that's an obvious and undeniable error.
It's also not one in this specific case that could be easily explained by accident.
So basically what they got away with for Hillary Clinton?
He was homicided by fentanyl huh? Cool autopsy.
"The official autopsy concluded that Floyd’s death was a homicide." No, the real (original) autopsy found nothing but massive amounts of drugs. Then the family got an independent autopsy to "find" what they wanted.
27 mill bucks those fine people got for raising a shitty drug addict criminal who attacks pregnant women in armed home invasions ..... I want a refund .
Still wondering why two police officers with boy armor got out of the back of the EMS vehicle to put George on a stretcher....
Those were Hennepin county paramedics. You can tell by the color of their uniform. It's not uncommon for them to wear body armor in this neighborhood. That's where we're at in this neighborhood.
I'm certain the junkies would love to loot that ambulance if given a chance.
It has fentanyl in it, too!
I think that’s his point...
Look fat, here's the deal.
All I'm saying is trunalimunumaprzure.
Hey cockroaches, who wants to feel my leghairs ??
It would not be surprising for the ambulance to be stolen. Seriously.
Minneapolis. It is no longer Minneapolis. Sad.
The city of Saint Paul wanted to stop using the name Twin Cities. They don't want to even be associated with Minneapolis anymore.
Nonsense. They’ve just replaced the Scandinavians. The food is so much better now.
I'm not familiar with the details of the events but just a guess - they were there to protect the paramedics in case Floyd woke up. Opiate addicts are sometimes delirious or angry when they wake up with naloxone in their system and Floyd had a history of violence and erratic behaviour.
George Floyd 2019 arrest video.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pu28epHmT0s
This video is key. Everyone should watch it.
Only had time to watch a few minutes.
What's the bullet point summary?
Im a fire fighter and my father in law is an emt... the police never ride in an ambulance the emts have shit to put the patient to sleep so no police are needed
For someone overdosing on downers, I'm not sure how wise putting them to sleep would be
They give them narcan to block the opiod receptors in the brain to stop the overdose before putting them to sleep
Sounds like a hell of a cocktail haha. Hard on the heart?
It only works because they're going into medical care where things can be monitored and corrected as various drugs wear off. If you just took all these drugs and passed out on your couch it would be very rough on you.
I get the ethical justification of putting drugs into somebody without their permission because the goal is saving their life.
What's to stop them from using the same justification to inject a "vaccine"?
Been thinking the same thing since all of this nonsense started.
The head scratcher for me was looking up the timestamp for the patent of the Moderna vaccine.
I stumbled upon that but didn't really look into it.
If I recall, the Moderna "vaccine" was under development prior to Covid, right?
Patent on website was shown 3 hrs after the announcement of the pandemic, as per Titus Frost channel via youtube, bitchute, dlive, etc.
Titus has a good habit of referencing show notes on familiar page linked through his channel. I need to work on having all of that info/intel before bumping my gums through this message board.
With the vaccines itll be not to save your own life but to save everyone else
I have a feeling at least the kneeler won't walk free. Not with the jury I saw presented here. No way, no how.
Of course, poor Chauvin cannot possibly have a fair trial with how the coverage influenced the entire globe. Odds are 9/10 people in that jury already have their minds made up and aren't moving. Maybe their will be one person willing to be open minded, and that could mean all the difference
Want to bet that that ONE person (IF they exist) will either be bribed, bullied, or theatened?
If they're smart and redpilled, they'll pretend like they have a favorable impression of BLM, then vote not guilty at the roll call.
Unfortunately I think that the prosecution is smarter than that. And the defense may just be a circus act.
About one of the jurors:
Mixed-race woman in her 20s Getting a chance to serve on the Chauvin jury was the reason this young woman registered to vote, she told the court. “I was super-excited” to be called for the jury, she said. "That’s actually why I voted.”
The young woman, whose occupation didn't come up during jury questioning, has an uncle who works as a police officer in northern Minnesota. One of her only concerns about jury duty was whether she would have time to check her blood sugar because she has Type 1 diabetes.
Like some other jurors, she said she could face personal risk by serving. “But I’m not as concerned about it as I probably should be,” she said.
Friends “kind of consider me to a type of mediator,” she said, which could be helpful during jury deliberations.
She said she believes her community improved because of the massive protests that took place after Floyd’s death. Asked about her opinion on Black Lives Matter, she said, “I like the idea of what it's supposed to be about. But it’s been turned into a marketing scheme by companies.”
She noted that she’d heard some people mention that Floyd had drugs in his system. “I don’t necessarily agree” that drugs could have caused his death, she said. “It could have everything to do with it. It could have nothing to do with it.”
What a fucking joke.
She sounds like a twit.
Just look at the rest..
https://patriots.win/p/12i3uaK6Nk/heres-a-detailed-breakdown-of-al/
She was just talking about jury duty in general. She even says "I didn't know what it was, I didn't care what it was, I was just excited to be summoned".
Commietard , party of 1 ,your table is ready ......
[ sounds like the media BLM grooming of women was successful]
Here's the rest: https://patriots.win/p/12i3uaK6Nk/heres-a-detailed-breakdown-of-al/
The only perspective juror that I heard about that may have chosen to acquit was the one that feared for his safety and his identity being revealed. He was dismissed.
Not just the coverage, the house passed some George Floyd reform policing act, that basically says these officers are guilty ahead of the trial. If that isn't grounds for throwing this out I don't know what is. Chauvin will never get a fair trial.
I know we have freedom of speech still (I think) but we ought to be jailing all the people with large media platforms who immediately started calling this murder because they are the reason this guy will never get a fair trial. They destroyed this man with w reckless political speech which amounted to flat our lies.
This is why I defend the UK's media reporting restrictions on criminal trials. Lots of Americans got upset at Tommy Robinson being prosecuted for contempt of court but it's explicitly to assure a fair trial.
Do all the reporting you like after the trial, even share the statements made in court, but the US media carnival makes a mockery what was already a shitshow of a justice system.
It's disturbing how powerful the media is. They edited and withheld footage to frame a police officer for doing his job and half the population is too stupid to notice.
They edited President Trump saying peacefully and patriotically. That pencil neck dog shit Schiff lied and gave his interpretation of the ukraine phone call. They do this because no one stops them. They lie to our faces and treat us like chumps, and we let them.
Well did ya see how much publicity there was leading up to the trial? Mr and Ms Corporate Suburban Consumers on the jury don't have an original thought in their heads.
Seems to me that this can't possibly be a fair trial. I've never been on a trial (thank god!) but isn't one of the questions, have you heard about this before?
I think my Father or someone else told me they heard someone slip up and say "Yeah I read about it in the Paper" or maybe it was my Grandfather when he was called for a jury many decades ago. And they booted him because he had some background of the case before walking in.
About one of the jurors:
Mixed-race woman in her 20s Getting a chance to serve on the Chauvin jury was the reason this young woman registered to vote, she told the court. “I was super-excited” to be called for the jury, she said. "That’s actually why I voted.”
The young woman, whose occupation didn't come up during jury questioning, has an uncle who works as a police officer in northern Minnesota. One of her only concerns about jury duty was whether she would have time to check her blood sugar because she has Type 1 diabetes.
Like some other jurors, she said she could face personal risk by serving. “But I’m not as concerned about it as I probably should be,” she said.
Friends “kind of consider me to a type of mediator,” she said, which could be helpful during jury deliberations.
She said she believes her community improved because of the massive protests that took place after Floyd’s death. Asked about her opinion on Black Lives Matter, she said, “I like the idea of what it's supposed to be about. But it’s been turned into a marketing scheme by companies.”
She noted that she’d heard some people mention that Floyd had drugs in his system. “I don’t necessarily agree” that drugs could have caused his death, she said. “It could have everything to do with it. It could have nothing to do with it.”
What a fucking joke.
I'd think that she would be disqualified from serving EITHER WAY. Her familial relations would either make her sympathetic to the police (1% chance of that actually based on all of the other comments) or 99% sympathetic to the victim. Surprised the defense didn't get her booted out. And if they didn't want to boot her, imagine what the other juror candidates were about.
This is a very detailed breakdown of all of them, it's an interesting read that will make you lose any faith you had in the jury process.
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2021/03/28/derek-chauvin-trial-jurors-share-opinions-police-discrimination/7003860002/
Yikes. Typical MN.
LOL. You could take a giant dump in the middle of her community and light it one fire and it would improve her community instantly. She has no community. She only believes all those thugs and criminals are a community because they all have the same skin color and "community" has been a buzzword in those types of communities for at last 30 years.
Certainly used to be that way as I understand it.
No rules now though, anywhere. Of course.
Riots incoming either way it turns out.
They are already down there protesting. The jurors know if they do not convict the city will burn.
When the court of public opinion becomes the actual court system...
I blame Nancy Grace for the current state of this. She is the first person I remember who had a show doing that very thing day after day. She's now at FOX.
Did anyone ever like her?
They are going to regret turning Floyd into a martyr while their own voting base burns the city down around them.
They dont care. They will still blame white people and the system. Those in power don't live in the chaos they create. They are never held accountable either. Let the whole place burn, i only wish they will be caught in the mayhem and lose their lives as well.
This is what happens when you bow to the mob. They will never be satisfied, ever.
They are going to riot no matter what the outcome of the trial is
They already did that last summer. The destruction in Minneapolis was massive.
...Which reminds me ...WHAT SNAKE MURDERED ASHLI BABBITT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Opening arguments, main arguments and closing statements takes less than 20 minutes. Heres the coroners report showing no damage to the neck, toxicology report showing he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him 3 times over, the police training handbook showing the appropriate hold to put someone in on the ground, and finally the video showing Fentanyl Floyd saying he can not breathe while in the car and asking to be put on the ground.
Fucking open, shut case!
Nothing short of a full conviction of everyone will prevent riots, and they will still happen.
How does Keith "Cunt-Punter" Ellison still have the legal right to be a lawyer after beating up his spouse?
Because it's Minnesota.
I really wish this was televised so we could see all the evidence ourselves.. MSM will cherry pick the fuck out of this. After having cities all over America burned down over this specific case - we deserve to witness the entire process and all the evidence.
Umm. I'm watching it live. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8uWCAf4H_w
Unless they can show that he forced Floyd to ingest all of those drugs, he is not guilty.
And he was Covid-positive. 🤔 So why, in this case, is this not a Covid death?
George Floyd killed himself
Mob rule may very well determine this trail. I’m sure the jury is afraid of what people may think of them...
Minneapolis is going to burn no matter the outcome of this trial.
yes it will
Is that true? My understanding was that was the families autopsy?
Yes an no. The official autopsy is fraudulent. Specifically the cause of death. It says homicide as the cause of death but when you read the entire autopsy not only is there nothing to support that but the physical findings demonstrate that it was not homicide. Rather natural causes, well as natural as a heart attack is when also infected with COVID-19 and an overdose of class A drugs is while also suffering from hypertension and heart illness.
All the defence has to do is take the coroner to the stand and ask how they ruled it a homicide. The whole thing crumbles.
Well hopefully the defense is smart
Fuck off. Nobody cares.
There's about 4,000 things more important to deal with than some druggie Leftist martyr.
It does matter because we're about to witness a man get unfairly punished.
Yea, dont know why this garbage is being focused on.
Why were the cops there, again? Oh yea, because drug addict criminal Floyd was trying to pass counterfeit currency in a local business.
They'll never be held to account for it, but all those bystanders hooting and hollering, threatening those officers, are just as responsible for Floyd's death as the officers themselves (neither party is as responsible as Floyd himself).
When people approach officers in the middle of making an arrest, that officer has to assume their intentions are hostile. This divides their attention between the subject of the arrest and the bystanders, who could be armed.
Seem like maybe Chauvin's attention being divided had something to do with him not noticing that Floyd was OD'ing?
this trial is a show. it clearly wasn't murder in the legal sense (man-slaughter maybe, not murder). he is forced to be found "not guilty" by definition. they ramped up the charges knowing this full-well. it's a way to shut up the folks (giving them a sense of justice/revenge) while at the same time protecting their own.
Your honor, Floyd pointed a gun at a pregnant woman’s stomach so him and his friends could rob her.
Are we done here?
Why is Chauvin taking all the notes while his lawyer is twiddling his thumbs?
it's probably mostly for optics
the jury will be scrutinizing Chauvin, e.g. his posture, facial expressions, breathing (like sighing or yawning), etc., and will project their own meaning on each of their observations
he'll fare better if he appears to be paying rapt attention to everything by taking "notes" (even if he's just writing over and over: All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy)
He's making a list of guns, ammunition and supplies that he'll need for the rest of his life after the trial.
it's as good of a time as any to start prepping!
He's wearing a mask. How will they tell if he's smirking?
they'll look for a lifted eyebrow ;-)
Awww shhheeeeiiiiitttt
Defense Opening Statement: "Dindu Nuffin was a scumbag, drug-dealing felon who died from an overdose of multiple illegal drugs. Officer Chauvin should be receiving a medal. The defense rests."
I’m 25% black - can I get a free TV when they are qcquitted?
I'm betting you'll get a free TV even if he's found guilty. The riot machine is primed and it will start up no matter what.
I’m planning my budget:
New Sneakers if he’s found guilty - New TVs if he’s acquitted
whynotboth.jpg
If he comes out of this alive.. no he's dead. He's dead.
The riots are going to be off the charts!
I personally can’t wait to watch that city burn then watch all the retards in that state sitting there with a surprised pikachu face.
Please use the Chewbacca defense. Please use the Chewbacca defenses 🤞😬🤞
Any juror who votes "not guilty" knows that an angry mob is going to burn down their home. There's no way that a few Antfia/BLM supporters didn't make it onto the jury. The best Chauvin can do is a hung jury.
Especially juror #9 who allegedly registered to vote just for the sole purpose of wanting to be on this jury.
Officer Fentanyl & George Kirby Floyd need to be charged, exhume the body and charge him for murdering himself.
I'll never get how such an ugly, big-lipped baboon became a martyr when there's proof of what an absolute scumbag of a person he was.
Glad I'm not on that jury.
Fentanyl Floyd robbed a pregnant woman at gun point. He already sold his soul to the devil.
The left picks the shittiest people to be martyrs.
The prosecutor can't even make up their mind on whether this is first, second or third degree murder. So why not argue for all 3? If not for the massively friendly jury, this case would've probably been tossed by now.
Also, is it just me or is the prosecutor appear to deliberately be trying to fail?
They have second, third and manslaughter
You mean suicide
fake 20 dollar bills
It's all theater. The verdict is already in. I'm not paying attention to this farce. The fact that the trial wasn't moved says everything you need to know.
The way Biden acts you think he is on Fentynal.
Liberals and other demonic cucks can shove their black criminal worship religion right up their fucking asses.