They did reduce the RT-PCR Cycle Threshold to reduce false positives, but the CDC also changed their recommendation on not even administering an RT-PCR test unless the patient has symptoms of COVID-19.
They let the cat out of the bag on the asymptomatic transmission scam last summer. It caused such a panic among the lock down fans that the had to issue a correction to the media.
This is because they cycle threshold count was reduced from 40 to 30, not because of reduced testing sites
Partly true, I don’t see nearly as many people in queue though when I drive by the sites.
When a piece of fruit tests positive for covid-19, why would anyone want to get tested? What's the point of it's no better than flipping a coin?
I heard this but does anyone have a link to a source?
Actual sauce: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05 Alt media article: https://wearechange.org/right-on-cue-for-biden-who-admits-high-cycle-pcr-tests-produce-covid-false-positives/
They did reduce the RT-PCR Cycle Threshold to reduce false positives, but the CDC also changed their recommendation on not even administering an RT-PCR test unless the patient has symptoms of COVID-19.
Wait...so they just cured asymptomatic spread? Sheeeeeeeeeit, Trump shoulda thought of that. /s
They let the cat out of the bag on the asymptomatic transmission scam last summer. It caused such a panic among the lock down fans that the had to issue a correction to the media.
NY Post