Why not? What is your logic? Something meant for only one thing can only be used for this thing?? Really?? Are you serious or just dumb? Do you really want me to enumerate you all the things used for something else than primary purpose?? Astonishing that we have the dumbest of the dumbest here....
Great response. No it hasn’t there is no documentation of an unadulterated sample. There has yet to be a sample that hasn’t had other genetic material added to it. So no they haven’t.
So, no, you don't have any fucking clue what you are talking about. Don't even try to discuss science with me, just read some books and write papers first.
I know what he’s talking about. It doesn’t change that the PCR test isn’t for testing for infectious disease. Why would the test now be ok for corona?
Why not? What is your logic? Something meant for only one thing can only be used for this thing?? Really?? Are you serious or just dumb? Do you really want me to enumerate you all the things used for something else than primary purpose?? Astonishing that we have the dumbest of the dumbest here....
It sounds like you think that the PCR test is an accurate test for a virus that has Nevber been isolated. fucking dumb prick.
Nevber isolated? What are you talking about?? No one ever isolated your brain, that's for sure!!
Great response. No it hasn’t there is no documentation of an unadulterated sample. There has yet to be a sample that hasn’t had other genetic material added to it. So no they haven’t.
I also wanted to remind you that the flu has disappeared this year? I can’t imagine where it went.
So, no, you don't have any fucking clue what you are talking about. Don't even try to discuss science with me, just read some books and write papers first.
So would you say the PCR test is suitable to isolate and identify the Sars Cov2 Virus?
No I wouldn't, why would I say something as general? it's a