What the fuck is that gobbledygook? One state can win in court with the right argument. The argument against trannies in women's sports is crystal clear. Bring on the lawsuit. Why is she cutting and running?
The bill was written so shitty that it would have given the ncaa a slam drunk case with the Obama judges that were in that district. Did you not research this at all? She's not cutting, she's building a better case.
How about Noem does her job and lets the courts do theirs? Give me that day in court if the sociopath pedo party demands it. Let's see the ACLU put feelings over science. I want this fight.
Why is it a bad law? I have yet to see that explained. Is it a bad law to keep trannies out of women's sports?
And you mean the 9th circuit that Trump reworked that still sits comfortably below the Supreme Court that Trump also reworked? Maybe let's have that fight. Or, she could just roll over and take the L. I guess we can see what Noem prefers.
As to the courts... Despite of the balance of the Ninth Circuit mostly being corrected by President Trump, it is by no means a conservative court. En banc, they still lean Left (treats the Constitution as a "living one".. ugh)
And, as we found out the hard way, post Election 2020, nominating/placing Justices on the Supreme Court is no guarantee that they won't reveal themselves to be gutless wonders!
Be any of that as they may, why would one want to hurry-hurry to push a bill thru and sign it, when the time to make it right IS during the legislative process? Why not make it better before turning it into law. It's a given that Leftists & trans will attack whatever any state passes. Why make it an easier job for them? Why rely on & chance it on the courts to adjudicate correctly? Simpler to get the best possible bill thru, no? Is anyone claiming that the N.Dakota bill is as unassailable as possible? Isn't the Tennessee bill better/stronger? Why not adopt that language, or something like it? Why is the SD legislature trying to override instead of negotiating with Gov Noem? What is their angle? There's something unsaid here, and I can't quite figure out what...
What the fuck is that gobbledygook? One state can win in court with the right argument. The argument against trannies in women's sports is crystal clear. Bring on the lawsuit. Why is she cutting and running?
The bill was written so shitty that it would have given the ncaa a slam drunk case with the Obama judges that were in that district. Did you not research this at all? She's not cutting, she's building a better case.
How about Noem does her job and lets the courts do theirs? Give me that day in court if the sociopath pedo party demands it. Let's see the ACLU put feelings over science. I want this fight.
Why is Noem so afraid to face the enemy?
You aren't seriously saying the Obama judges have no prejudices, are you?
And you've argued such cases? Would a bad law have much chance in the 9th Circus? Just curious
Why is it a bad law? I have yet to see that explained. Is it a bad law to keep trannies out of women's sports?
And you mean the 9th circuit that Trump reworked that still sits comfortably below the Supreme Court that Trump also reworked? Maybe let's have that fight. Or, she could just roll over and take the L. I guess we can see what Noem prefers.
As to the courts... Despite of the balance of the Ninth Circuit mostly being corrected by President Trump, it is by no means a conservative court. En banc, they still lean Left (treats the Constitution as a "living one".. ugh)
And, as we found out the hard way, post Election 2020, nominating/placing Justices on the Supreme Court is no guarantee that they won't reveal themselves to be gutless wonders!
Be any of that as they may, why would one want to hurry-hurry to push a bill thru and sign it, when the time to make it right IS during the legislative process? Why not make it better before turning it into law. It's a given that Leftists & trans will attack whatever any state passes. Why make it an easier job for them? Why rely on & chance it on the courts to adjudicate correctly? Simpler to get the best possible bill thru, no? Is anyone claiming that the N.Dakota bill is as unassailable as possible? Isn't the Tennessee bill better/stronger? Why not adopt that language, or something like it? Why is the SD legislature trying to override instead of negotiating with Gov Noem? What is their angle? There's something unsaid here, and I can't quite figure out what...