She can't "execute the will of the people" if the courts strike down the law. That's why she wants language that is "court proof" so to speak. You have to word it in a way so that an activist judge can't find an easy way to invalidate it, and make sure there is a pathway towards appeal and argumentation in the Supreme Court.
Just make the changes (or copy the Tenn. law) and resend it to Gov Noem for signature. If she were to not sign that which she asked for (or praised, in the case of the TN law), then I'd jump on the bandwagon against her.
Is it her job to execute the will of the people or stand in the way because we might lose a case in court?
She can't "execute the will of the people" if the courts strike down the law. That's why she wants language that is "court proof" so to speak. You have to word it in a way so that an activist judge can't find an easy way to invalidate it, and make sure there is a pathway towards appeal and argumentation in the Supreme Court.
but if the language change doesnt happen that means there is no bill. i'd take the poorly worded bill over no bill any day
Just make the changes (or copy the Tenn. law) and resend it to Gov Noem for signature. If she were to not sign that which she asked for (or praised, in the case of the TN law), then I'd jump on the bandwagon against her.