From what I have researched, it's because it was destined to fail, thus giving the left case history to squash later litigation. She's forming a coalition strong enough to win bigger battles. It's a tactic that's she has been successful with in the recent past.
What the fuck is that gobbledygook? One state can win in court with the right argument. The argument against trannies in women's sports is crystal clear. Bring on the lawsuit. Why is she cutting and running?
Why is it a bad law? I have yet to see that explained. Is it a bad law to keep trannies out of women's sports?
And you mean the 9th circuit that Trump reworked that still sits comfortably below the Supreme Court that Trump also reworked? Maybe let's have that fight. Or, she could just roll over and take the L. I guess we can see what Noem prefers.
From what I have researched, it's because it was destined to fail, thus giving the left case history to squash later litigation. She's forming a coalition strong enough to win bigger battles. It's a tactic that's she has been successful with in the recent past.
What the fuck is that gobbledygook? One state can win in court with the right argument. The argument against trannies in women's sports is crystal clear. Bring on the lawsuit. Why is she cutting and running?
And you've argued such cases? Would a bad law have much chance in the 9th Circus? Just curious
Why is it a bad law? I have yet to see that explained. Is it a bad law to keep trannies out of women's sports?
And you mean the 9th circuit that Trump reworked that still sits comfortably below the Supreme Court that Trump also reworked? Maybe let's have that fight. Or, she could just roll over and take the L. I guess we can see what Noem prefers.