I don't think there's anything wrong with using the birth certificate, since South Dakota is still recording biological sex on birth certificates. However, the "affidavit" part seems more concerning.
Good luck. Leftists are going birth certs and they play to win. They know how important word meanings are (laws, birth certs etc). They are running rings around everyone else. Noem is right to be concerned about the wording of bills etc.
In Tasmania, Australia...they are apparently already not recording biological sex on birth certs.
I don't think there's anything wrong with using the birth certificate, since South Dakota is still recording biological sex on birth certificates. However, the "affidavit" part seems more concerning.
Good luck. Leftists are going birth certs and they play to win. They know how important word meanings are (laws, birth certs etc). They are running rings around everyone else. Noem is right to be concerned about the wording of bills etc.
Noem is the one who want to change the wording to include the words "birth certificate" and "affidavit". Those were not in the original bill.